Periodically readers will ask me why I do this or that thing, and rather than offering the same explanation over and over again in comments, I thought I would create a post I can direct you back to any time these questions come up.
The purpose of a House Style is consistency. The most important part of the rule is to have a rule, nothing else. And to keep it in place. So, first,
I will be very slow to change any of these rules. And if I do change them, it will be for all posts at once and in future, not just for one here or there.
Names of actors will be used instead of characters in film reviews (the thing I get asked about the most)
There are 3 reasons:
- If people are new to the films, it is very important to learn who all the actors are, so I am hopeful that using actor names will help them to do that. And will help promote the actors to new audiences.
- And then for long time views, using character names often would be more confusing than star names. For instance, imagine trying to discuss Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham saying “Rahul” “Rohit” and “Yash” instead of “Shahrukh” “Hrithik” and “Amitabh”. Especially if you are reading about a film you have not yet seen, you want to know what happens to “Salman Khan”, not some character whose name you don’t really know.
- Finally, for many films (not all, but many), the actors are more playing themselves than any particular character. This is not necessarily a bad thing, a familiar star persona can add to a narrative. But it also means that specific character names versus star names become even less important.
There is a very rare exception to this rule. When a character is so notable that it overshadows any actor. In that case, I will use the name, as a tribute to the writer, the director, and the actor in what they have accomplished. For instance, “Kattappa” in Bahubali. However, generally, I will use the actors’ names instead. This will make more or less sense for some films, but again, the goal is consistency above all.
Public figures will be referred to by first names, nicknames, and honorifics interchangeably with full names as is standard in Indian press
- Again, if you are getting used to the films, you should learn all these names, it is important, and my using them will help you.
- I want to be respectful, and so I will use the naming convention of the culture these people are from, not my own culture. Therefore “Dilip Sahib” not “Mr. Kumar”
- There is a reason for these nicknames and honorifics. It is not the same as “Brangelina” in the American gossip press, it tells you something about the status, the personality, the background of the person being referred to. For example, “Dilip Sahib” is a nod to Dilip Kumar’s Muslim identity, his refined demeanor, and his history of playing aristocrats onscreen.
- Finally, and more practically, considering the handful of last names shared through out the Hindi film industry in particular, nicknames like “Bebo” are a lot more specific than “Miss Kapoor” or “Mrs. Khan”.
SPOILER System: Isolated reviews, or only in the second half of a review
- If it is a new movie, I will post two reviews. A No SPOILERS one for people debating whether or not they want to see the film, and a SPOILERS one for people who have seen it and want to discuss in detail, or are not able to see it in theaters but want to know what happens. The SPOILERS review will begin with a brief summary of the entire film before going into more detail
- If it is an older movie, I will assume that anyone who wants to see it already has. Therefore, there will only be one review. The first half will deal with general themes and comments just in case you are unfamiliar with the film. The second half, separated by a row of “SPOILERS” warnings, will go into a detailed discussion with an assumption you have seen the film, no summary required.
Grammar, spelling, etc.
I write very fast and I write a lot. Which means there isn’t much time to go back and check for grammar and spelling and other typo kind of issues. Rest assured, I can actually avoid those things if I try, in fact in “real life”, I serve as editor and proofreader for everyone from my work supervisor to my friends’ academic articles. But right now, I would need to choose between only writing one perfect post a day, or writing 3 with the occasional problem, and I opt for the latter.
Shahrukh versus Shah Rukh
13 years ago when I first “met” Shahrukh, somehow the combined spelling was the first one I ran across. In the years since, I got used to using it, even though I know it isn’t what he prefers, or even accurate. So think of this as a little personal tip of the hat to teenage Margaret when she first discovered SRK.