Gauri Shinde: Twice as Good and Half as Far

Another talented exciting female director! And one just starting out in her career, only two films old which will make writing this post tricky.

I get so mad on behalf of Gauri Shinde. I think her husband is a bad trite storyteller, and she is brilliant, and it is SO unfair that her husband gets all the opportunities that she should be getting. But you can’t, like, say that to someone. Can you? “I think the man you love isn’t as good as you are and you should be getting the chances he is given”?

Gauri Shinde and her husband, R. Balki, started out kind of the same. They were both ad film makers. R. Balki was Gauri’s boss, the creative director at her agency. They got married the year his first feature film came out and, now that I think of it, probably that was also when he quite his job to be a full time director and thus they had no more professional/personally conflict and could be together. Aw, now I am liking R. Balki again because that is kind of sweet. I’m fickle.

Image result for gauri shinde r. balki

Anyway, Gauri Shinde had already made several short ad films and one non-ad short that made it to the Berlin Film Festival. Earlier I talked about Farah who started as a choreographer, and Mira Nair and Gurinder Chadha and Deepa Mehta who all started in documentaries, and Tanuja Chandra who started in TV. And Anjali Menon who, like Gauri, started in short films and then ad work before getting a chance at a feature. One thing that is universal, whether you are in British or Canadian or American or Indian film, is that it is far harder for a new female director to be offered a chance at a full length film than it is for a man. And so women have to come up from the side, be happy with little crumbs they are offered and try to make the most of them. Documentary shorts, song sequences, TV ads, whatever you can get while you smile and make nice and wait for the chances that are dropped in the laps of the men around you.

A little of this frustration comes through in Dear Zindagi. Alia, our heroine, is a cinematographer. She is talented and works hard but has never had the chance to do a whole film start to finish, she is only brought in for little bits and pieces, song videos or fill in an overseas shoot. Dear Zindagi never really addresses this question, instead it is just part of Alia’s overall frustration with her life and is resolved once she changes her mental attitude. But there could have been a different movie about a young talented woman who is angry because she is being denied opportunities she has earned, because her life is controlled by patronizing men around her.

Image result for dear zindagi camera

And I suppose a little of it comes through in English/Vinglish as well. Sridevi runs a business and a household and does it beautifully, and yet her husband laughs at her and her family dismisses her. She is doing the best she can with the little allowed to a woman, and instead of seeing that, they think that little is all she can do.

Gauri Shinde was 25 when she got a short film in the Berlin Film Festival. She already had a degree in mass communication and an internship a documentary filmmaker and was working in ad films. She was on her way up, she had talent, she had knowledge. And then she had to wait for 13 years before she had a chance to make her first feature film.

Maybe this was wonderful, maybe this is what she would have chosen, maybe it was nice to work with a variety of people on a variety of projects, have the security offered by advertising, enjoy her young womanhood. Maybe it was a blessing to be a woman with no expectations on you, to not have the pressure to advance to some kind of career goal. But I think if she had been another gender, it would not have been 13 years between her first international notice and her first movie. She was talented, she was likable, she was focused, this is the kind of person who is encouraged to come up with a project and take some meetings and get their work in front of the right people. That is, if they are a man.

Where the gender preference is glaringly obvious is in how her first, and then second, movies were released and received. English/Vinglish tells the story of a middle-aged housewife. Gauri got an amazing gift when Sridevi, the biggest female star India has ever had, selected her script as a come back film. On the other hand, Sridevi received an amazing gift when she was offered this film that let her be a character with depth and conflict and interest while still playing her age. English/Vinglish was a major hit in terms of profit versus budget, and tickets sold per screen. But it wasn’t a notable hit in terms of total money made. Because it didn’t get a mega-wide release, because it didn’t get a mega-sized budget, it could never reach the heights of, for instance, Barfi! which released on 1300 screens in India. English/Vinglish released on 739 screens. Anurag Basu, director of Barfi!, was coming off of a major loss with his last film Kites!. The star of Barfi!, Ranbir Kapoor, was coming from a string of modest hits mixed with flops. But Ranbir is a man, and Anurag is a man, and Barfi! was a male style picture, so it got a big release and English/Vinglish got half as much.

Image result for english vinglish

After English/Vinglish, a solid hit with a major star in the lead and loads of critical accolades, Gauri should have been set for her next film. But somehow, it didn’t happen. It took 4 years before she finally got Dear Zindagi together, and only then by managing to bring in a star to support her (Shahrukh Khan). As a Shahrukh fan, it is frustrating that Dear Zindagi tends to be forgotten when his filmography is discussed, when people ask him why he doesn’t take supporting roles, or encourage young actresses. But it is also frustrating as a fan of Gauri Shinde. Why is her film forgotten while the film from Imtiaz Ali or Maneesh Sharma is remembered?

Maybe the reason I feel so defensive about Gauri Shinde’s art is because the art itself is so proudly clearly female. Her two films were not just about female heroines going through life (as for instance Tanuja Chandra’s also tend to be), they were specifically about what it is like to be a woman in the world. Gauri’s two films aren’t about bad men or evil villains, they are about pervasive social practices that wear women down and turn even “good” man into enemies instead of allies. The films themselves feel feminine, female movies alone in a world of male movies that get all the advantages. Watching her films struggle for their piece of the pie is the same as watching a woman at a business meeting, struggling to be heard, struggling to make people see past her gender and to her value as a person.

14 thoughts on “Gauri Shinde: Twice as Good and Half as Far

    • It’s still a really good movie, but I agree, the casting is slightly odd. If nothing else, she is too young and looks too young. Her character should feel more like late twenties/early 30s, not early early twenties.

      On the other hand, if Dips played the role (my newest thought for alternative casting), the sexual tension between her and Shahrukh would have felt potentially viable, which would have made the ending all the more frustrating.

      Like

      • Alia was definitely too young for this role. The movie needed someone older, I should feel her struggle to maintain the relationships, the sadness that she can’t be happy and is not able to trust, the need of the therapy. The script is so rich! But instead of all that we have a girl who looks like she was just out of high school and has problems with her first or second boyfriend ever. Still good movie, but far less substance.

        Like

        • Yes! She is supposed to have just blown up two serious relationships in a row, and be frustrated that she is going nowhere in her career. Those are early 30s problems, not early 20s problems. I end up not taking her view of her problems seriously because it feels like an exaggeration, like she is worrying about stuff that aren’t a worry yet.

          Like

  1. I don’t know. I love this film and I think Alia is great in it – I totally read her as confusing gen-z gal and I’m so happy to see her do something with meaning. And actually my heart could not have taken it if they ended up together, no matter who the actress was. The whole film I was holding my breath saying “please don’t let this happen.” The character handled it so well and so appropriately.

    Liked by 1 person

    • He really did! Set her free in every way, even of himself. And with the Alia casting, it felt like 100% the right thing to do, the audience could see how they weren’t equal even if she was deluding herself.

      On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:13 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Liked by 1 person

  2. While DZ largely underwhelmed me, English Vinglish is one of my all time favourites. I tear up every single time Sridevi makes that speech in the climax. But though I’m Team Gauri Shinde all the way, I think you are giving Balki a bit of a bad rap. Have you seen Cheeni Kum or Paa? Or is your ‘trite’ comment on the basis of Pad Man and Ki & Ka (which I know you hated)?

    Like

    • Yep, seen Cheeni Kum and Paa. I think I’ve seen all his movies. Cheeni Kum felt different but had some things I didn’t like (the “sexy” jokes with the little girl, for instance). And then Paa had a lot more I didn’t like (the relationship between Vidya and Abhishek seemed really shallow and tended to let Abhishek off the hook a lot). And then I really didn’t like the most recent too. I think he gets by on good premises and then he fails in the execution, somehow can’t come up with an interesting thing to DO with the idea. Just has his characters go through the same old movements. I think Padman is the only film that avoided that trope, maybe because it had a strong script and producer before he came in.

      Like

  3. English Vinglish is one of my top films I’d show a person who knows nothing about Bollywood. I don’t think it’s a great film but it’s a solidly good and happy film, guaranteed to put a smile on your face. Sridevi was incredible in it, especially all the scenes where she has no dialogue but you can read everything in her face. The script wouldn’t work without her. The story would feel trite with anyone else playing that part.

    I hope Gauri gets more opportunities but just based on this film (haven’t seen Dear Zindagi yet) I’d say that I’d like to see her tackle more complex and nuanced stories.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Zindagi is interesting, because I would say that the script as a whole is stronger (supporting characters more clearly drawn in and so on) but the lead actress isn’t Sridevi and struggles to carry the film. So following your description, Gauri got better as a director/writer, but lost Sridevi, and so the film as a whole is less good.

      On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:44 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

  4. Do you see similarities in Gauri Shinde’s and Anjali Menon’s work? I wonder if Gauri should head South for her next movie. I guess that switching regions/languages is harder for a director to do than an actor or composer, though. 🙂

    Like

    • They have a similar way of building stories that feel lived in, I think. Dear Zindagi especially, the way every character feels so full and clear/

      On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 8:53 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

  5. I agree with you about Balki. His movies seem too weird and the emotional connnection seems lacking.Very clinical and ‘Gulzary’ to borrow your terminology.I find it interesting that Gauri Shinde and Ashwini Iyer of Bareilly ki barfi finally got a chance thanks to their drector spouses.Both of them are North-South couples too.Those who harp about the evils of nepotism should see that it’s not all bad.We got two brilliant directors thanks to that.

    Like

    • Reading about him, it sounds like he was an advertising genius, not just in making the short film ads (like Gauri did) but in coming up with whole ideas for campaigns. Maybe that’s what his films feel like? Like a clever idea you might use for an ad campaign more than a real story about people?

      On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:57 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

Leave a reply to Rachel Kaufman Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.