Box Office: Arjun Reddy Wins By Default

Well, this wasn’t a great weekend!  Terrible in the US, okay in some other places thanks to random spikes.  Arjun Reddy is still doing good, but it looks like it is doing better than it really is just in contrast to all the others.

So here’s the big news, Arjun Reddy is at the top of the list for Indian films in the US.  A Telugu film in week 2 a the top is a big deal by itself, a Telugu film like this (with the drinking and the sex and the casual attitude about everything) is a really really big deal.  But let’s dig a little deeper and notice that it is only on the top of the list because everything else is doing even worse.

Arjun Reddy is making $2,476.97 per screen in the US.  That is a solid box office for a second week, it is proof that an off-beat film like this can run and make a profit in the US.  That is NOT record breaking or the most profitable possible box office.  That’s just sort of “oh, yeah, that’s normal” for second week of a popular film.

Image result for arjun reddy poster

(Don’t celebrate so fast Arjun Reddy)

What is the story here is that this off beat odd film is doing better business than every mainstream option from every other industry.  It’s not necessarily that people are in love with Arjun Reddy, but they are definitely out of love with the other options.  At least in the US.  And that’s audience and theaters, Arjun Reddy is picking up screens in it’s second week, while the more mainstream films are coming out on many fewer than they would normally (Baadshaho on only 100 screens).

So, let’s see how the pitiful mainstream ones are doing.  Baadshaho is the worst, $1,825 per screen on only a 100 screens in the US.  But, interestingly, it did pretty well in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, around $4,000 per screen in each place.  And then terrible again in the UK.  This kind of maps, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand tend to be the action type places, and the strong Hindi belt places.  But that big of a gap is a little unusual.  I have no explanation.

Shubh Mangal Saavdhan is doing considerably better, while still not great.  $2,727 per screen.  But I think it is probably over screened, it’s on 95 screens which is kind of overkill for a small specifically northern film.  I would have said keep it closer to 50.  More than the pitiful 35 for Bareilly Ki Barfi, but not trying to make it into a full-fledged major release.  However, the total box office, from 95 screens, is still considerably more than Baadshaho on 100 screens.

Image result for shubh mangal saavdhan poster

But that’s the best news for Shubh Mangal Saavdhan.  Everywhere else, baaaaad.  No good in the UK, no good in Australia, no good in New Zealand, no good in Malaysia (well, nothing is ever good in Malaysia unless it is Tamil).  So, I guess what this is saying is that Hindi people have terrible taste?  In the US, where there is a strong southern audience, the vote was for Arjun Reddy over anything else.  In the Hindi regions, where Arjun Reddy wasn’t even playing, everyone picked Baadshaho over Shubh Mangal Saavdhan.

So, generally speaking, Arjun Reddy is doing very well in the US but is only looking that impressive in comparison to the other options that are doing a lot worse.  Baadshaho is doing okay in the traditional Hindi/Action markets.  Shubh Mangal Saavdhan is doing marginally okay in the US but not so good anywhere else.  And everything else, the new Punjabi film, the new Tamil film, the new Telugu film, is just doing not so great.  It’s a bad weekend, is what I am saying.  Arjun Reddy is the only one making any money at all, which is why it is looking so good right now.

Advertisements

32 thoughts on “Box Office: Arjun Reddy Wins By Default

    • I’m sure it will decide to leave eventually, when it gets good and ready.

      On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:39 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

    • Which is behind Baadshaho, based on what I am seeing. So again, very very good (especially since it sounds like a somewhat limited release), but qualified good. Mostly a sign that you can actually make a profit on this kind of movie, it doesn’t have to be just an “artistic experiment”, it can be an investment for a major studio, just like their children’s films or their romances or action.

      On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:43 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yes. It was made for just 3C. Including promotional budget. Maybe young bollywood would learn something from this. They have the luxury of working for home productions so maybe they should make really small budget films which are great stories and instead of taking a fixed salary (which has become a my dick is bigger than yours type of deal) they can ask for a share in profits. So they’d make more per film than what a fixed salary would get them.

        Liked by 2 people

        • All of the big names seem to be doing profit share now, which makes good sense for them because can you really put a realistic price on how much extra profit having a big star brings to your film? There’s no way to measure it. Profit share is the way to go, the film can still make a profit and the star gets compensation commensurate with what they brought in. Which I think is kind of what it used to be unofficially (back in the 50-60s-70s-80s), you wouldn’t get paid until after the film came out, and if it flopped, you’d do the producer a favor and lower your rate.

          But small names doing it too, that would really change things! If they started taking films just because they were interested in them and setting aside the payment. I think the more successful small names must already be doing that, no way Varun got normal payment for Badlapur, or will be getting it for October. Ditto Ranveer for Lootera. It’s the smart thing to do, let’s you get artistic cred and spread your wings a bit.

          On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

          >

          Liked by 1 person

        • Yeah difference between mild excusable pity and actual pity I geddit. But M was gracious enough to acknowledge the reasoning and lent her support so maybe I did win after all :p

          Like

        • Kya intro sahiba, myself really is 29 which you did weirdly accurately guess just here now. And with that out I can’t even throw around crude juvenile humor anymore which is all I know like I mentioned before :-\ so thank you for making me embrace the reality I kinda come here to take a break from!

          waise what will your mard think of you chit chatting with random internet stranger like this :p

          Like

          • my mard is very secure with his mardangi so he doesn’t care about non-issues like me talking to guys on the web. He’s your age BTW haha

            Not to psychoanalyse your situation but I am kinda intrigued about what could possibly be so wrong with your reality that you’d need to take a break from it and try to find comfort in the company of feminists online?? care to share??

            Like

          • Hey, feminists are the best! who wouldn’t want to spend time with us?

            On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:21 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

            >

            Liked by 1 person

        • Hehe nothing super wrong or anything. Just in a weird sorta mental space that’s all which I’m sure many have felt when suddenly 30 is coming right at you as sure as another RGV Sarkar or Rohit Shetty Golmaal film.

          Like

        • Not falling for that no way. Nope. Thou shalt not tempt me out of my shell. Putting it into words will only make it even more real and final. Denial and pretense have gotten way too comfy for that :p

          But that also worries me if it makes me a sly attention seeker actually wanting people to ask me that. See this is why I stay away from this rabbit hole in the first place. You had to ask and prod 😐

          Like

          • Oh come on!! We’re all blog friends now. We’re all sharing here. Margaret has even let us into her house. Come on dude. Your anonymity remains intact. What’s the harm in telling your story if no-one can trace it back to your real life? I’ll show you my damage if you show me yours.

            Like

        • Yaar you can’t do this. Without wishing to further draw out what is now unfortunately becoming tedious drama (surely?), I cannot let myself off the hook pouring out all the crap I can’t possibly avoid forever, on the internet to a friendly and well intentioned but still not-really-across-from-me person. It will only serve to further delay having to really face up to all that stuff closing in on me anyway that I’m still avoiding (can’t run away forever kab tak bhaagoge). Heck even this blog in all honesty is part of that delaying strategy but one that I’m always aware of at all times. Which is why I kinda freaked out when M suddenly said in one of her posts about how much she can glean about her readers from what they post. But it was at least coming across as somewhat funny and getting me what I wanted and I could continue. And now this?!

          Like

  1. Pingback: Youtube Video: Arjun Reddy and Baadshaho Box Office (Also, More Hair) | dontcallitbollywood

  2. Pingback: Box Office: Shubh Mangal Saavdhan Finally Gets It Up | dontcallitbollywood

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s