News Round-Up: Pranushka are NOT Married, Censor Board Declares Liberality, Yash Raj Announces 2 Movies, and Robot 2.0 and Sunk Costs

Happy Tuesday!  The box office figures for this week released early, so I already wrote about them, which gives me an opening in the schedule to do a news round-up.  What fun!

Pranushka are NOT Married

But they could still be dating! Keep hope alive!  Anyway, there were persistent rumors that they got secretly married, they both gave statements saying “no, it’s private, if I get engaged I will tell you”.  So, either they are just poor at wording statements (don’t say “it’s private” if you want to kill all relationship rumors), or they are very good at wording statements and aware that keeping these rumors going is very good for them.  Or, of course, they really are passionately secretly in love and will announce their engagement and/or marriage at a later date.  Keep hope alive! (full story here)

Related image


Censor Board Disagrees with British Board

The original issue is kind of a none issue, the British censor board gave Race 3 a higher rating and requested a cut for violence.  Not sure if I even believe that part of the story, because usually censor boards don’t actually get to issue cuts.  They might have said they would give an even higher rating because of a certain scene and the producers/distributors volunteered to make a cut.  Anyway, I find it completely unsurprising that the British censor board found Race 3 too violent and the Indian board did not.  Different values, different cultures, different concerns, even a different tradition of film.  Race 3 is violent, but in the sort of cartoony over the top Salman Khan way we have all gotten used to.  If I were watching it without context, I would probably be shocked and react like the British board, “no one under 12 should watch this”.

The bigger issue is that the Indian censor board has always leaned more towards the “offending religious sentiments” concerns and the “too much sex” concerns, and avoided violence all together.  In response to this story coming out, a current member of the board trumpeted the new era of openness and their direction to have as few cuts as possible.  While Pahlaj Nihalani, who really loves the sound of his own voice, declared it a travesty that the “Sanskari” era of censorship he ruled over has ended. So, lines are being drawn, the censor board is publicly proudly claiming an openness in contrast to what was before.

But, neither of these statements has any relevance right now!!!!!!  Violence has never been a “Sanskari” issue.  It could be, I suppose, but it hasn’t been up to now.  The British board didn’t react to the implication that Jacqueline and Salman had sex or all the item songs or anything like that, they don’t care.  They just don’t like people exploding and getting blood on other people.

So I guess what I am saying is “politicians are being political and turning an issue into what they want it to be to support their statements”.  Not the biggest news in the world. (original story here)


Yash Raj Announces Two Movies

Yash Raj is continuing their policy of balancing small with large even in their announcements!  On the one hand, producer/director Indra Kumar of the Masti series is working with them to make a “clean comedy” using a group of young people from their talent discovery group.  Not a bad idea, comedy is a good genre to introduce new people, if it’s funny enough the audience will come no matter what.  And it’s also cheap (usually), so they can make this thing and not worry too much about any potential losses. (full story here)

(Although will anything ever be as good as this song?  I don’t think so!)

And then there’s the other movie.  A period piece by Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi, director of Pinjar and a bunch of critically acclaimed TV serials.  On the Mauryan empire, Akshay Kumar is playing something, and some other actor is being looked for to play Chandragupta Maurya.  Or, as some of you may know him, “that old man who throws away his sword at the start of Asoka“.  I guess the era of historic epics is just going to keep rolling along then.  And also, I wonder who they will end up with to play Chandragupta?  Who would look really good in a wig?


Robot 2.0 and Sunk Costs

Everyone deals with this all the time, when are you throwing good money after bad, versus when are you making a reasonable decision to keep going just a little further?  The human instinct is to keep going, if you spent $500 to fix the car and now learn it will be another $1,000, you don’t think “wait, the whole car is only worth $2,000, I should just sell it and buy another”, you think “I already spent $500, that money will be wasted unless I spend another $1,000 now”.  Or you spend a decade in school working towards a particular profession, then get your first job and realize you hate this profession, but to give up now would mean you “wasted” that decade in school, so you keep going.

I found a study that says the best way to force our minds out of their natural instinct to keep going on a broken path is to focus on the good.  If you want to change professions, don’t think about those 10 years in school, think about how happy you will be in your new job.  If you need to stop patching up the old car, don’t think about all the time and money you already put into it, think about how great it will be to have a new car.

The problem is, I’m not sure the 2.0 makers have anything like that to hold on to.  And this movie has now reached far far far far far past the point of “sunk costs” and into the “are you insane?  Why would you keep going?” point.  Like the guy who refuses to leave his house when a volcano is about to hit, because he spent so much on the renovations.

In case you missed this, Robot (the original) was a massively expensive and massively successful film by Shankar, King of Special Effects.  So the budget and ambition went even higher for the sequel.  It was chugging along on schedule, and then suddenly stopped.

Two things happened.  First, they decided to shoot it 3D but had no idea what that meant.  They just used really good cameras and counted on the film lab to be able to 3Dify it later, which is not the best way.  And second, they contracted with an American company to do all the massive amount of CGI and 3D work needed.  And that company completely failed, the footage they got back was unusable.  They were left with nothing and had to start over.

Now, this is the point at which you say “maybe I write a book on the experience, too bad this movie will never actually come out”.  The budget went from 65 crores to 90 crores to, now, 160 crores.  It is mathematically impossible for it to make a profit at this point.  You just cannot make back 160 crore.  Not saying the box office won’t be more than that, it could easily be more than that, but the producer only gets a fraction of the box office, it also goes to the theater and the distributor and the taxes and so on.

I don’t know why they are still going.  I guess it is the “sunk costs” idea, the production house just can’t imagine spending this much money and never actually getting a product.  But it’s also a lesson in the dangers of, well, all sorts of things!  I’ll count them down:

  1. Again, the problem of the director being funded rather than self-funded.  Shankar was given complete control and no consequences, of course he would run wild, just like Anurag Basu did with Jagga Jasoos and Abhishek Kapoor with Kandarnath.
  2. Trusting “American companies”.  I am sure they were very fancy and said all the right words and so on, but just because they are from overseas doesn’t mean they know what they are doing.  It’s an odd sort of self-hatred that makes you trust an outsider more than someone at home.
  3. Gross rather than net profit thinking.  This is a consistent problem, the focus on that big box office take without thinking about the relationship to the budget.  You see it in every language industry, and in every part of the industry, fans and media and stars and everyone just focused on that big number, without thinking about the actual profits.  Robot 2.0 could very well set box office records, but that doesn’t mean it will ever be able to make back it’s budget for the producers.

23 thoughts on “News Round-Up: Pranushka are NOT Married, Censor Board Declares Liberality, Yash Raj Announces 2 Movies, and Robot 2.0 and Sunk Costs

  1. `
    Whole semesters at engineering school are spent on warning of the dangers of being seduced by the sunk costs syndrome.


    • Clearly, no time is spent on it at film school, and it really really should.

      On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:41 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  2. Yup he is becoming desperate now.
    Release whatever has been done. I feel sankar is trying to topple bahubali and not improve himself which is a wrong attitude


    • They are saying what has been done is completely unusable. But that just can’t be right. Even if you have to release an abbreviated version without any fight scenes, there must be some usable footage. Also, at this point, surely it would be cheaper and faster to reshoot with practical effects than keep trying to make it into a special effects epic. I would be happy enough seeing Rajinikanth and Akshay punch each other without any special effects, they could save crores and crores just doing that.


  3. It’s about time for another Mauryan era epic.Illegitimate oppressed son taking the reins of the empire from the hands of his legitimate brothers is the stuff of Bhansali’s dreams but for the lack of a leading lady.Though there are any number of TV adaptations around.Akshay is too too young to play Chanakya.Maybe Nanda the chief baddie? Nah not enough glory for him.I think he’ll insist upon playing Chandragupta in the end.


    • But he would look terrible with long hair and a semi-shaved head! I’m very head focused, after Shahrukh’s wet mop hair ruining Asoka for me. Prithviraj?

      On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 9:33 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



    • Bhansali only uses these epic time periods for his boring love stories. If you take away the costumes and the artificial bigness of his movies, there is nothing left there. He would not ever be able to make an actual warrior movie.


      • How did Bhansali get into the discussion? It’s being directed by Chadraprakash Dwivedi.

        But I agree on your assessment of SLB.


    • That’s the story of Asoka, not of Chadragupta Maurya. Actually the story of Chanakya and how he installed the Maurya kings by deposing the Nandas before them is extremely interesting and complicated and full of intrigue. There’s not much of a romance angle. There is at least one classical Sanskrit play about it which mirrors the Mahabharata pretty closely, and even has an “item” girl role. 🙂 Really, it reads like the original masala movie plot.

      I would actually look forward to this movie very much (btw, not much chance for “warriors” in it, either, it’s mostly political intrigue), but Akshay Kumar is totally a misfit for any of the major roles. I think any of the current “heroes” would be misfits, as they’re too modern in their aura. Of course Ranveer could do it, but he’s the wrong age — doesn’t fit any of the characters. But I can see him pulling off either Chanakya or Chandragupta.


      • It sounds like it would be a great movie for a more mature/stage trained cast. I am sure we won’t get it, but can you imagine how good something like Nana Patekar, Jaideep Ahlawat, Jim Sarbh, Kumud Mishra, Naseeruddin Shah, and Pankuj Kapur would be as the main cast for something like this?


        • Alexander the Great? That Alexander? I thought he didn’t get that far south?

          On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:31 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  4. This is exactly what 2.0 deserved for going to shady American companies for VFX just to boast about using American companies. They would have used it in their PR just like movies brag about what make-up artist or action director they got from Hollywood. It’s beyond silly. There are enough VFX companies in India doing good work and could use the boost to have any need to go outside.


    • Yes! That was my feeling as well. They went to America so they could boast of going to America, but didn’t bother doing any due diligence to make sure it was a good company. I don’t know of any other movie that bothered with America, and Robot was done by an Indian company, so just stay with them.

      Agree about other movies as well, half the time when they brag about the make-up artist or action director coming from over seas, the end result is as good or worse quality than all the other movies that use local talent. And almost every time when I actually look up the person in the Hollywood websites, they are some nobody who has no great qualifications than anyone would have in India. The only exception to this being the make-up artist brought in for Fan, he was the real deal.


  5. The funny thing is that when Shankar produced films, they were always low budget, story oriented scripts with no real special effects to speak of. He clearly gets the concept but somehow you still get 2.o. Endhiran had the same problem. It went over budget and another production company stepped in but they seemed to get things under control and the movie made enough money to be worthwhile.


    • Now you’ve got me thinking about the Shankar movies I’ve seen. And yeah! Odd stories, but complicated strong stories. And one special effects set piece usually in a song. The cast was more the star than the special effects.

      On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:54 PM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  6. Hilarious to see Hindi media still gaga over Prabhas – Anushka. I’ll be very surprised if they get married. Even if they are in love. He has bright future in politics and his marriage is going to be a political one. Heirs often don’t have the option of marrying for love!! Happy to be proven wrong because I’m a great fan. I loved him from his first movie ‘Eeshwar’ and I’m sure not many people can say that 🙂

    As yjbasu mentioned, there is a Telugu movie on ‘ Chanakya Chandragupta’ which is okay. ANR was terrific as Chanakya and NTR was too old to be ChandraGupta. I would have loved to see someone like ‘Deva Katta’ (Prasthanam) attempt this. Chanakya is focused, Rakshasa is loyal and ChandraGupta is a good disciple. I like Amit Sadh for Chandragupta and Manoj Baypayee for Chanakya. Akshay could be Alexander!!


  7. @Margaret Alexander didn’t attack Magadha which was ruled by the mighty Nandas and which would have needed crossing Ganga. There’s a theory that Chandragupta Maurya (who may or or may not was Nanda’s half-brother) was part of the mercenaries in that area.He’s assumed to be the Sandrakottas mentioned by the Greek historians.He was either hiding from Nanda.Or he was an independent mercenary captain who later raised an army against the Nanda dynasty long after Alexander left India.Even after Alexander left, he left Seleucus Nicator in charge.Chandragupta Maurya went to war against the Greeks after deposing Nanda.As part of the cessation of hostilities, he married Seleucus’s daughter.Who just might be the heroine the movie needs.Because god forbid a Hindi movie should exist without a romantic subplot.


    • Now I am trying to think of a part Greek actress they could cast, and my mind is a blank.

      But I could see Akshay being good in the father-in-law/former ruler kind of role. Only he would never accept it because that would mean acknowledging he is now old enough to play the heroine’s father instead of her love interest.

      On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:56 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



      • Why does it have to be a Greek actress?I don’t remember anyone in Troy looking remotely Greek.Eric Bana came the closest.If Akshay’s ego could handle it, he could play Rakshasa who is Chanakya’s opposite number in Nanda’s court.He’s clever, conniving and fanatically loyal to the Nandas even after their death (according to Mudra Rakshasa the play).Chanakya later recruited him to take his place after he (Chanakya) retired from Court.


        • Well, Akshay is playing the villain in 2.0, so maybe! I would love to see him playing older wily antagonist. That’s kind of what he did in Airlift but not really. He was the hero, but his heroics were bargaining and playing sides against each other and that kind of thing, not beating people up.

          On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:33 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.