Hindi Film 101: 4th of July Week, A Brief History of Desi Immigration to America

Woot, American History! The thing I got my undergraduate degree in! Let’s see if I can dust off those skills.

The starting point for understanding desi immigration to America is that, in American racism, White people are on top, Black people are on bottom, and everyone else who is non-white is juggling for position depending on historical forces just above Black people. And I use “White” and “Black” on purpose, because American racists do not care what your ethnic heritage is, or what the ethnographers say about your background, they care about how American culture has decided to label you. America has made up our own nonsense meaningless categories of “race” that are best described with “Black” and “White”.

Perfect Black and White Cookies Recipe - NYT Cooking
Like the cookie

Until less than 100 years ago, those nonsense labels of “Black” and “White” were part of law. There were routine court cases determining and refining who they were applied to, and Asians (along with American Indians and Latinx) were a big part of those cases. Are Asians in America, legally, “free white persons” or not? The answer was a resounding “NOPE!”

Until the 1960s, a variety of immigration laws made it impossible for Asian immigrants to become American citizens, and the social pressures made it hard for them to survive and thrive in America at all. There was a trickle of immigration from all over Asia (Japan, China, South Asia) before the 1850s. When California suddenly economically expanded in the 1850s, the need for cheap labor was enormous and the new California business kings encouraged immigration from China as the easiest way to fill that demand. One particular province in China, which was experiencing upheaval and economic difficulties, began sending in thousands of young male laborers. At the same time, the plantations in Hawaii had similar need for cheap labor and began to bring in Japanese and Chinese and Korean (although at the time they were legally Japanese and were considered as such) laborers. Once the population exploded, so did the prejudice against the population. The “yellow threat” became a political rallying cry, politicians pushed for laws to “protect” America from these different folks.

Her Father's Daughter: Stratton-Porter, Gene: Amazon.com: Books
Gene Stratton-Porter, author of The Girl of the Limberlost, was a flagrant disgusting racist. This whole book is about the “yellow threat”, culminating in a Chinese man being killed and the police covering it up.

What was different from the start about the Asian immigration was that it was so strongly male. In 1875, the “Page Act” cut off female immigration from China because it was believed all female Chinese immigrants were prostitutes. I am sure that was the case for some of them, we are talking about women arriving alone in a rapidly expanding economic zone and sex work is a common entry level field. But this act in one move tarred all Central Asian women with the same brush so far as American society was concerned, to this day the central Asian facial characteristics on woman are seen as “sexy” above all. It also doomed the Chinese male immigrants to loneliness, which lead to their own stereotype, the dangerous single sexual predator.

Of course, people did start families. Love finds a way. Every time there was a gap in the immigration laws, there would be a rush to take advantage of it. For instance, in 1907 America made an agreement with Japan that they would limit emigration on their side, but on our side we would allow for “family reunification” (that is, if one of the few immigrants legally allowed from Japan came to America, they could send for their family later). This lead to “picture brides”, a single man in America would “marry” a woman in Japan without ever meeting her, just seeing her picture, and then file papers to provide for her legal immigration to the US to be reunited with her husband. After the San Francisco earthquake, there was another burst of immigration with “paper sons”. The San Francisco immigration records were lost in the quake and following fires, which allowed the very few legally naturalized Chinese citizens of America to suddenly claim dozens upon dozens of “children” back in China who could legally immigrate and join them. And then of course one of the more common realities, which is not necessarily discussed because it makes people uncomfortable today, is that the members of the non-white communities formed new connections and married each other, across ethnic groups.

In America, on a state by state level, there were what were called “anti-miscegenation” laws. “Miscegenation” is a made up word that means “marriages between races”. Various complicated court cases determined that, according to these laws, Asians were not “white” and therefore could not marry “white” people. But they could marry any non-white folks they cared to. In the regions of America where the Asian population was enormous, this lead to a delightful mixing and matching as heart met heart without concern to background. Filipinos, Japanese, Chinese, Latinx, American Indian, all met in the middle for a while there. And yes, this includes South Asian.

Who Were The Punjabi-Mexicans Of California & Why Are They Fading ...

The earliest South Asian communities in America were Punjabi Sikh farm laborers. They first arrived in 1907, and by 1909 there was a nice tidy set of laws in place to define how they were “not white”. There was an even larger Punjabi Sikh community in Canada, and most of the Punjabi Sikhs in America tended to be near the Canadian border, in Washington State or California. The nice fresh laws we had created just for them meant they could not bring family to join them in America, they could not become citizens, and no one else could join them, but at least they didn’t have to leave. So you have a group of young men who were kind of on an island. They could stay in this new country (and remember, this was during the height of the Quit India movement unrest in the Punjab area, there were a lot of reasons they might not want to return to India), but they would be forever alone. Only, not alone. Maybe there were only a few thousand Punjabi Sikh young men, but they were surrounded by other people, other Americans. And so a small stable community sprung up of Punjabi Sikhs who married Latinx women (not against the law to marry other non-whites) and settled in America, raising their children half-Latinx and half-Sikh.

After WWII, finally, America began to consider that folks who were not-White might still deserve American citizenship. But just to make things fun, we began to draw new lines to divide those not-Whites into separate better and worse categories. The legal measure that interests me is that in 1943, Chinese-Americans were finally given a legal route towards citizenship BUT were still not allowed to own property. In 1946, South Asian Americans were also given a legal route towards citizenship and WERE allowed to own property. The law defined it, South Asians were ever so slightly better than Chinese so far as America is concerned. Ever so slightly more “White”.

Dalip Singh Saund.jpg
Dalip Singh Saund, first South Asian descent US Congressman, was elected shortly after these laws passed. And then the first Chinese descent Congressman two years later.

The post-war era also brought in some more loopholes for people to leap through as fast as they could. Family reunification was still on the books, and now that all these Asian Americans who were already here had a route to citizenship, they could become citizens, and send for as many family members as they wanted. On top of that, there were the war brides. Again, love finds a way. All those nice young male soldiers met these nice young local women in Asia, and suddenly the fiddle-faddle of racial divisions back home seemed very far away when you were young and in love.

And then, FINALLY, we have the Immigration Act of 1965. This was the first non-racial immigration act in American history. Quotas were placed without regard to race. And the path to citizenship was the same whether you were White, Black, or “Non-White”.

The Surprising Origin of Our Modern Nation of Immigrants - The New ...
Woo-hoo, President Johnson! Democrats pushed this through by the skin of their teeth.

The 1965 act brought in two major methods of immigration, one being needed skills, and the other being (still and always) family reunification. If you are a doctor, or an engineer, you can immigrate to America and we will (kind of sort of) welcome you. If you are the parent or child or sibling or spouse of a doctor or an engineer, we will grudgingly make space for you. This was the law that lead to the explosion of South Asian immigration to America, in a very clear 1-2-3 pattern.

  1. The doctor or engineer. Often not just a professional, but a highly skilled professional. A university professor level desirable worker.
  2. Their relatives. The brother who they help set up as an accountant, the other brother who they help to purchase a business, the cousin who they get into the country and then leave it up to him to figure out how to earn a living.
  3. Their children. American born and raised, struggling to assimilate in a place where they have a tight strong family based large community, that is just a tiny dot in the larger culture.

Hopefully, at this point, this starts to sound familiar to some of my readers. It should be familiar, to any American not just Indian Americans. In the 1970s, we started to get the occasional figure of a person in a sari in our little “where are people from” children’s books. And one of my father’s childhood friends married a woman from India, the only Indian person my parents knew well, but at least there was one versus 0. In the 1980s, suddenly a random Indian-American might pop up as part of the group of friends in a children’s TV program. I was growing up in a mid-sized midwestern city in the 1980s, and we had one South Asian kid in my pre-school class, and one South Asian kid in my elementary school. By the 1990s/early 2000s, there was a mass number of South Asians in America, especially second generation, to the point that they started creating communities for themselves. College clubs, independent movies, jokes about “ABCD (American Born Confused Desi)”, and the word “Desi” itself, added to the vocabulary to describe people of South Asian origin without bothering with what country they were from. All were “desis” together.

This Penn Also Sings | Cities News,The Indian Express
This is when Penn Masala started, a college acapella club that mixed together American R&B with Hindi film hits.

This was also the era when Hindi films hit the mainstream. There were a lot of reasons for that, technology and economy and artistry and so on, but part of it was that “Desis” in America wanted movies that spoke to their unique community. Kal Ho Na Ho, Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham, Dil Chahta Hai, all the way to Love Aaj Kal, they showed life overseas as simply “life”. You went to malls, you went to college, you had career plans, you weren’t spending every moment thinking “am I Indian or am I American?” Heck, in some of these movies, that question wasn’t even a concern, Kal Ho Na Ho for instance firmly identified it’s central characters as American with no thought of returning to a “homeland” where they had never been.

And then that era peaked, and passed. By 2000, the Indian American community in America had exploded, by 2010 it was even larger. Back when the first Punjabi farmers arrived, they couldn’t even have wives from their own community, they were forced into the most intimate possible connection with other American communities. In the 1960s, some of those first wave immigrants, the doctors and professors and so on, married outside of their community (it was legal by then). In the 1980s, the children of those immigrants were forced to assimilate with their friends, to date and party and aspire to the life of mainstream America. In the 1990s, that group began to move out and grow up and come to urban areas and learned to enjoy having a collective identity, not one defined by individual languages or religions or their parents’ national heritage, but as “ABCD”s, young Americans raised by South Asian parents, excluded by their appearance from mainstream white culture while still living largely within it. But in the 2000s, suddenly there were so many young professional South Asians, both raised in America and immigrating as adults, that you didn’t have to have those collectivist identities any more.

American Desi - Wikipedia
Surprise hit movie back in 2000s, and now there are think pieces about the death of the word “desi”.

Now there are Telugu associations and Tamil associations and Bengali associations and on and on, there are separate temples depending on your separate background. And of course original national boundaries, which used to be so porous just 15 years back, are suddenly set in stone. People aren’t “desi” any more or “South Asian”, they are proudly “Indian”.

India is very eager for people who are Indian heritage and no longer live in India to continue to feel like Indian citizens. Before, our few Punjabi Sikh farmers were on an island, cut off from home, and forced to build a new life where they were. The 1960s and 70s and 80s immigrants to America took a less extreme but similar leap, they moved towards American citizenship and were aware that much of their connection with their homeland would be gone. But now, now you can legally vote in Indian elections even if you have not been to India in years, you can live in America and build a life in America and still tell yourself you are Indian. And on top of that of course there are the technological changes, the ability to email, to call, to communicate constantly. Satellite TV, you can watch all your Indian shows. Food, there is a whole massive industry to make sure you can eat your Indian food in America.

Bombay Bazaar, Corona - Photos | Facebook
This is what puzzles me. If you are in America, why are you eating pizza made with Indian style cooking and ingredients, instead of American style pizza? Or Indian food? It’s this pretending you are in India pretending you are in America, rather than just being in America, that I find interesting.

We can see this in our movies, again. The Indian-American community is increasingly uninterested in films showing Indian-Americans. They want to see a patriotic film re-affirming their identity as “Indians”. Or they want to see a small family comedy film set in the heartland, transporting them back to what their life would have been/should have been if they were back “home”.

Of course there is no one monolithic “Indian-American community”. There are desis who still primarily identify as “desi”, who are concerned with the issues of the larger South Asian community within America. There are rebellious young Indian-Americans who actively fight against the patriotism and Indian identity of their parents. There are young Indian-Americans who grew up almost entirely assimilated and are enjoying the new opportunities to explore their heritage thanks to these new cultural groups. But the most present and vocal community today has become the ones who trumpet the “Indian” over the “American”.

15 thoughts on “Hindi Film 101: 4th of July Week, A Brief History of Desi Immigration to America

    • Oh, you were the one who steered me to that story! I remembered someone on the blog had mentioned something about that, which gave me a start in researching it, but I couldn’t remember who it was. Thank you! That is such a fascinating little bit of American history.

      On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:39 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

        • Me neither! I knew about the little Sikh pioneer population, but I didn’t know about the Latinx combo until Alisa sent the link to an article a while back. Just makes sense though, they were a bunch of young men alone in a new world, of course they are going to fall in love and marry the people who are part of their new community.

          On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:04 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

          >

          Like

  1. Love this, perfect for this week. Adding here a few related historical tidbits I’ve picked up over the last few years:

    1. During that first period you describe, in the mid 1800s, when people found their way here and before the racist exclusionary laws were passed, there was also a phenomenon of Chinese men in New York marrying Irish women. This was partly because they ended up in the same neighborhood of new arrivals and partly for mutual benefit. It was a path to citizenship for the Chinese men, and for the Irish women it was a step up in economic and social status – because the Irish immigrants, fleeing the famine, were impoverished and looked down upon, while the new Chinese immigrants generally had a trade and were admired (according to the Orientalist stereotype) for their wisdom.

    2. On laws and definitions of whiteness, the 1923 US vs. Bhagat Singh Thind case is fascinating.
    https://www.sceneonradio.org/episode-40-citizen-thind-seeing-white-part-10/

    3. In the 1965 Immigration Act, the person most responsible for prioritizing family reunification, and thereby the connected and growing communities you describe, was a racist congressman from Ohio named Michael Feighan. He thought that by putting family connections on par with skills as a path to citizenship, he would favor existing, well-established (read Western European) immigrant communities over previously excluded groups. That he turned out to be exactly backwards is just a historical delight.

    Liked by 1 person

    • 1. Oh that is really interesting! And makes complete sense. Even after the laws changed, I am sure there were plenty of common law long term couples, because that’s what happens, folks just fall in love.

      2. Yes! That case is fascinating! He was a WWI vet and everything, total perfect test case subject. And that the Supreme Court felt it was important enough to define even when there were so few desis in America.

      3. HA! That is hilarious!!!! And I am remembering now something my Asian American history teacher mentioned in college, that the family reunification laws were not anticipating the large close family bonds of the Asian communities. So it’s not just bringing over your kids and wife, it’s all your siblings, and your parents, and your aunts and uncles, and your cousins, and on and on and on.

      On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:36 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

  2. The way I see it, patriotism has transformed into nationalism in the US & India both, reflected most blatantly in the elected governments of the day. Therefore as desis begin to feel ‘othered’, they move their allegiance towards their home country.
    Also regarding the Bhakri pizza, I don’t find it puzzling at all. There are people who legitimately prefer Indian Chinese over authentic Chinese food & Indian pizza where the ‘toppings’ are under the cheese 😜

    Liked by 1 person

    • I kind of prefer Indian Chinese! It’s great. Authentic Chinese is too authentic for me. American Chinese or Indian Chinese, that’s my comfort space.

      Like

  3. Very interesting. I knew some of the stuff already, but these details really are so fascinating to read about. So sad to hear that even the word Desi is disappearing because I love that word and I personally relate to more the Indian NRI’s shown in Indian movies (Simran from DDLJ or Vaani from Befikre especially) than anything else from either Europe or Hollywood.

    I have minimal knowledge of the small Indian diaspora that are here in Finland, but I wish I knew more so I would know where they stood on the community front, because so far as I remember there is still that celebrating being Indian together (there is an Indian festival in the autumn I attend almost every year, there seems to be no separating communities, which I suspect is from the small minority they have here) and from the looks of it it’s more of the unity as Desi’s than ‘us vs them’ that it is America. But then again I could be completely off and it is the same inside the Indian living in Finland or Europe experience.

    Like

    • Picking up on the comment you just made on the other post about Sweden versus Finland, I think that might be a good comparison for the “desi” versus “Indian” identity. If you were to come to America, in some places you could find specifically Finnish communities, but in a lot of places you might end up joining just a general “Scandanavian” community, still with a lot of things in common, still giving support within a larger culture, and with national boundaries a bit less meaningful.

      Wait, scratch that, you actually lived overseas for a while already, so you may have already experienced this a bit and I’m just explaining something you already know.

      On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:24 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

      • Oh right XD

        And yea I’ve exprienced it somewhat, but it feels different still because being white I’m privileged to not have racism and bigotry coming to me no matter where I go, while it still is a factor for those who come to Finland and how it makes one think of one’s homeland in contrast to the country you are currently living in.

        Like

  4. Great detailed article about the Indian American journey. It was never a walk-in the park and many are still struggling with self identity- never fully belonging to one side or the other. Our culture keeps us grounded.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.