I just wrote and posted this a few months back, so probably y’all remember it and have already read it. But just in case, for his birthday, I am posting it again. Because Ranveer is an interesting dude.
Usual Disclaimer: I don’t know these people, I have no special knowledge of anything related to them, this is just how it appears to me based on publicly available information.
When I was little and my Mom was explaining our family history to me, she started by explaining that when people immigrate from one country to another, they usual stay in the same kind of socio-economic class that they were in the old country when they arrive in the new country. My family were a bunch of boring practical middle-class farmers. They sold their land and property in the old country, took a boat to America, and bought roughly equivalent land and property here. That was one branch, another was a doctor who, again, sold his land and property in the old country, took a boat to America, and bought a house and set up practice in America. Same to same. That’s not to say that the culture shift was not traumatic, or that it wasn’t an extreme situation which forced these people to leave their home (Revolutionary Spring of 1848, 6 different branches of my family all fled Europe the same year, that place was a MESS). But the vision of a refugee arriving with nothing and continuing to have nothing is not really accurate. It takes a lot to drop social classes like that, even if you lose absolutely everything you own, you still have your education, your attitude, your social graces, and your connections.
What does this have to do with Ranveer Singh? His family background is a bit of a contradiction. On the one hand, they were refugees who came to Bombay after Partition. On the other hand, they are very very wealthy. Both of those things can be true. His family has the same shock and trauma of any refugee family, the same distancing from their homeland, the same cutting of family ties. And they are also part of the highest level of Bombay society in wealth and power.
Ranveer grew up rich, there’s no two ways about it. His childhood was similar but slightly better than the childhood of most film kids. He grew up in Bandra, the exclusive luxury suburb of Bombay that was originally founded by film people before it became so exclusive and where large parts of the film industry still live. He went to the same high quality private school kindergarten through high school. But his childhood also included routine family trips overseas, not as part of an outdoor shoot for a film (the only way most film brats got overseas trips) but just for fun. He had fancy overseas clothing, not as hand me downs from film costumes but just because. And he went to parties with the rich and powerful of the city, not as an entertainer, but as a person.
On the other hand, Ranveer grew up middle-rich. That’s a weird way to say it, but it’s true. His family could get a meeting with a politician, but they couldn’t buy and sell politicians. They lived in Bandra and Ranveer went to a good private school, but he wasn’t surrounded by bodyguards or police protection. His life was a little better than the average film kid, but not so much better he couldn’t touch them. As is clear from the fact that he is related to the Kapoor family, not THE Kapoors, but the Boney-Anil-Sanjay branch, the poor relations of THE Kapoors.
Ranveer’s mother and Anil Kapoor’s wife are first paternal cousins. As paternal cousins, they grew up in close households. Anil and Sunita have been together forever, since he was a struggling actor and she was a young model (modeling=respectable temporary pre-marriage job for a rich girl). Sunita married a struggling actor from a decent family, her cousin married a young son of a property developer who was beginning to take over his father’s successful business. Over the years, Ranveer would see his Kapoor second cousins at occasional large family parties, and he vaguely know that “Uncle Anil” was in film, but he wasn’t close to them. His social circle overlapped with their own, but was not the same as their own, he could drift down to the film level, or up to the political and business level, floating between all parts of Bandra society.
The biggest sign of Ranveer’s family wealth is that he had choices. When he finished high school, he decided he wanted to pursue writing/communication. In a middle-class family, that would not be allowed, he would have to pick a profession with a guaranteed income in future, something “safe”. But his family was rich enough to lose their fear, to be able to give their son options. He started at a local Bombay college, and then was accepted to Indiana University in America.
Now, this is where “middle-rich” comes up again. If you are rich-rich, the only acceptable overseas schools are the few name brand ones, Oxford or Harvard or Yale or Cambridge. Unless your child is really spectacular, the only way you are getting them into those schools is by giving a huge amount of money in donations. I mean, truly truly huge. And then your kid gets the designer name degree, and the worldwide news organizations that report on your family won’t make fun of you and so on. Alternatively, if you are middle-rich, than you have the resources to meet the basic requirements for an international university to accept your child. You know the tests they need to take, how to fill out the application, and you have the money to pay the international tuition rates. It is expected for your child to get an overseas degree, that is the basic level to avoid humiliation, but it doesn’t have to be at the top-top university.
Ranveer Singh’s degree is from Indiana University. Here is where “name-brand” education starts to trip people up a lot. Indiana University is the 136th best university IN THE WORLD. The best university in India, IIT Bombay, is the 513th best university in the world. Going to any decent university in America gives you an education 5 times better than you would get at any school in India. Don’t think “Ranveer isn’t that smart, he just got a degree from Indiana University”, think “No one in India has a decent college education by international standards”. Ranveer going to Indiana University means he is better educated (not necessarily smarter, but better educated) than most people he has to interact with on a daily basis.
If you go to a decent college, it’s not about getting in, it’s about what you do once you get there. We have talked before about how the “Test” and “degree” obsession messes with Indian education. The value of an IIT education is seen in the ability to pass the entrance exam to get in, and then to have that degree when you get your first job. Not the actual knowledge you gained in school. In America, the value is in the education you gain, because at this point 37% of all young people have a college degree. Just getting in, even graduating, is frankly not that impressive. It’s about gaining tools that will let you succeed later in life.
Indiana University is a classic state school in America, which means the knowledge you gain there is priceless. I went to a state school like that, so did my parents and grandparents. Before you get your degree, you have to take classes in literature, history, math, science, and prove your ability to not just repeat what you learned but actually add something new to it. Your grade is based on your final papers, 10 pages of original thought with citations and proofs for it all. And in class discussion, did you challenge the teacher? Did you make yourself stand out from the rest of the class? Are you capable of thinking for yourself, of challenging what you have learned, or proving a new idea? The goal of these schools is to send out into the world well-rounded people, ones who can handle the requirements of their actual professions (engineering, agriculture, medicine, whatever) but also know a little bit about a lot of things. And that goal is constantly being reconsidered and re-worked. When I went to school, before I graduated with a degree in history, I had to take 3 advanced science classes (I got all the way to Calculus 2 in mathematics, along with transferring in two credits from high school in biology and chemistry), 2 classes specifically about understanding other cultures (I did modern South America, and South Asian history), 2 classes in a foreign language, and a basic writing course (even as a humanities major, it was still a requirement that I learned the basics of good academic writing and research). The classes about other cultures and the basic writing course were added within the past 20 years as the school realized they needed to update their basic graduate requirements to reflect society. I also had a scholarship that required I do at least two semesters of volunteer work. And that was along with various requirements for my own degree, including taking at least 3 graduate level seminars where I was expected to write a 20 page paper based on my own research and original sources. If you went to college in America, you are reading all of this and thinking “yeah? So what?” But we don’t realize that, as graduates of American universities, we are getting the best college education in the world. Even at an “average” school like Indiana University, it is better than what you get in many other places in the world.
Ranveer went to Indiana University planning to get a degree in creative writing. Indiana University has the 12th best creative writing program in America, so it was a good choice for that degree (first best program, University of Iowa. Those name brand schools don’t actually give you the best education, depending on where your interests lie). As a student at an American university, Ranveer had to take classes in multiple areas. One of his random electives was an acting class, and he immediately fell in love with acting. Interestingly, Kevin Kline also went to Indiana University and had the same experience. He was going for a degree in music, but took acting as a required elective and fell in love with it. Heck, I had the same experience! Not at Indiana University, but at my own state school I was planning for a History or English degree, and then I saw a film class that I thought looked interesting.
That’s how these schools are designed, you have to learn a little about a lot of things, and that lets you change your mind along the way, find your passion. Or even change your mind later, my father got an engineering degree and then went to law school, I got a history degree and then a masters in Film Studies, actually everyone in my family got an undergraduate degree in something unrelated to their Masters. Because as a graduate of an American college, it is assumed that you know enough about anything that you can join any grad school program (I would love to see an IIT grad from India try to get accepted to a law program in America. Sorry, I know I am being mean, but education is important and it is important to understand the limits of it).
I truly believe that this educational experience is one of the most important things to understand about Ranveer Singh, and what makes him unique among the young Hindi stars. He came from wealth and privilege, and the benefit of that was sending him to a 4 year American school. He got a true college education, and a true college experience, with freedom and experimentation and mixing with all people from every where. This is a privilege that most other current Indian film actors do not enjoy. They had to learn it later, after they became successful, how to date casually, how to go to parties, how to dress in western clothing without drawing attention, how to converse on a variety of topics, and so on and so forth.
And Ranveer also got true acting training. He minored in acting and majored in creative writing at Indiana University (remember, 12th best program in America). I happen to know a lot of theater people who have equivalent training to what Ranveer would have received at Indiana, and it is intense. He would have performed in multiple student productions, meaning professional directors, costumes, sets, etc., and then full performances at packed auditoriums in front of thousands of people. He would have learned about make-up, set design, costumes, wigs, all that nitty-gritty. He would have learned how to take a script and a character and really break it down to the essentials. And he would have learned how to use his body as a tool, how to modulate his voice, to deliver a monologue, to use gestures and movement to tell a story.
This isn’t to say he knows any more than many actors working in India today. That same experience is what, for instance, Raj Kapoor got by growing up backstage at Prithvi Theaters. Or Nawazuddin Siddiqui with his National School of Drama degree. But if you are comparing him with his rising star contemporaries, in most cases there is simply no comparison for the qualifications with which Ranveer arrived versus what they had at the start. If you are looking at Ranveer and see his strange confidence, the way he appeared to burst on the scene already fully formed as an actor and a star, the way he excels in highly technical parts (make-up, wigs, accents, mannerisms), that’s what a good education can give you.
Ranveer is more than merely his education, but I want to divide those two halves of him, what he gained in knowledge versus his inborn talent. And it seemed easiest and clearest to start with the knowledge and do the talent second. Especially since it is the talent that Ranveer himself tends to highlight while he hides the knowledge (possibly because the Indian media and public would have a hard time processing what a college degree from America really means).