Monday Malayalam: Ranam Review (SPOILERS), Just Barely Misses the Mark

I already did my No Spoilers review, you can read that if you have any hope of seeing the movie in theaters.  But if you are stuck waiting for streaming that may never come and want to learn more about it, you can read this one.

Whole plot in two paragraphs:

According to this movie, Tamil and Malayalam gangs are on the rise in Detroit thanks to the civic instability and the easy access through Canada for illegal immigrants.  Rahman is a Sri Lankan refugee turned violent crime lord.  He loaned money to Nandhu to buy a garage, and to pay off the debt Nandhu and his nephew Prithviraj have been working for him, dealing drugs and smuggling, for years.  Prithviraj wants out, now that the debt is paid. Rahman lets him out but plans to find a lever to force him back in because he will need him in an upcoming war with the Polish gang.  Meanwhile Prithviraj’s teenage nephew Mathew Arun has a crush on Celine Joseph, a troubled rich Malayali girl he knows through his private school.  Celine is the daughter of Isha Talwar, a Kathak dance teacher married to a wealthy successful businessman Shivajith Padmanabhan who ignores both his wife and daughter.  She is also an old friend of Giju John, the Malayali-Tamilian detective in charge of tracking down the gangs.  Prithviraj had a brief encounter with Isha and fell in love at first sight but does not feel he is worthy.  Meanwhile, Celine is building a crush on Prithviraj.  She approaches him one night after a fight with her parents, unaware that Prithviraj is trying to get Mathew out of town that same night since Rahman is threatening him to gain leverage on Prithviraj.  Prithviraj, in a hurry, dismisses her and rejects her, and then agrees to sell her drugs when she accuses him of merely being a drug dealer in order to get rid of her.  Celine overdoses and dies on the drugs Prithviraj gave her, filling him with guilt.  INTERVAL

In the second half, Prithviraj is firmly back under the thumb of Rahman, trying to keep Mathew safe and out of things.  He still feels bad about Celine and starts haunting the road outside her house, watching over Isha.  Prithviraj follows Isha as she takes the bus away from home and helps her when she is approached by a group of harassers, beating them up and saving her.  He takes her to Giju John’s house, but the next morning his wife wants her gone.  Prithviraj takes her back to his house and they quickly fall in love.  Prithviraj has the job of delivering a van to a hotel, but discovers there is a bomb in the back.  He refuses to help in mass murder and drives the van out of town.  While Rahman is looking for it, Isha discovers Prithviraj’s responsibility in Celine’s death and leaves him.  Nandhu and his family hide out in his garage and wait to leave town.  Prithviraj returns to discover that Nandhu was killed while his family watched and Isha is gone.  Broken, he goes to confront Rahman personally and fights him, then draws in the Polish gang members as well.  Until they are all locked in together and he sets off the bomb, neatly removing all the crime kingpins from his city.  He stumbles into the police station and turns himself in, while Isha leaves town with his car and half the money he stole from Rahman, the other half given to Nandhu’s widow and children with instructions to return to India.

Image result for ranam poster

 

The problem with this movie, is it doesn’t quite know what it wants to say.  Prithviraj knows what he wants to say, his character makes complete sense and everything works when he is onscreen.  He is a man born of violence (watched his father kill his mother when he was a small child) who lives by violence, and also hates it.  He tries to get out, and it just gets worse.  The only way to save those he loves is to give into it, no more pretending to be anything else, kill Rahman and all the others who oppress the city and oppress him.  That’s easy.

And by extension, Isha Talwar also mostly makes sense.  Some of her backstory does not.  She is established as a teenage mother who met her very wealthy husband in college.  He married her because she wouldn’t have an abortion, and then proceeded to ignore her and their child.  So far so good.  But then, she is a TERRIBLE mother!  Incapable of setting rules or boundaries, hesitant around her daughter, she cares a lot but doesn’t seem able to act.  She also appears hesitant around her husband, reaching out to him over and over again only to be rejected, hurt that he is having an affair with his secatary even though it is clear this has been their life all along.  Oh, and she teaches Kathak dance to abused women to help them build confidence, a charity.  And yet she herself has no confidence.

So, all of this almost works, but then not quite.  I think what bothers me the most is that she seems to have no instinct for self-preservation.  That’s something an abused woman would hone quickly, know what questions to ask and what not to ask, how to teach her children to stay quiet and be safe, and I would also expect that the teenage mother bond combined with the joint victims of abuse bond would drive her and her daughter closer, not farther apart.

It’s so close to working though.  Her shy careful demeanor in public, her isolation, her daughter’s anger, her feeling of guilt since this is a choice she made back then, to force him into marriage and have his child, all of that makes sense.  It just needs to be changed the smallest amount to work better, have her daughter be angry with her for being weak, or desperate for fatherly approval, have her explicitly decide not to punish her daughter because she feels she has no right after having ruined her life with her choices, have her react to her husband’s obvious public cheating with hurt pride, carefully hidden, rather than shock and anger.

Image result for ranam isha talwar

(Can we also take a moment for Prithviraj choosing to work with an older actress playing an older character while all the other Malayalam actors are working with tiny little freshfaced models)

But once her daughter is dead, Isha’s story makes complete sense.  She finds strength in hopelessness, finally able to leave her husband because there is nothing left to fear (poverty, isolation, all of that is nothing in the face of her grief).  She clings to Prithviraj because he is kind to her, and gentle, and safe.  And she can sense that he understands her pain, he is a little broken inside as well, very different from her angry uncaring husband.  Even the quick romance makes total sense, she wouldn’t question how fast things happen, that this stranger just showed up to save her and then offered to take her home and let her live with him, because she wouldn’t be thinking logically about anything at this point.  I am happy with Isha, being the broken living victim of violence, the one with the scars inside, who fits with Prithviraj as the inner scarred perpetrator of violence.

But as you expand out from these two stories, things make less and less sense.  Mathew Arun, he is supposed to be the good boy innocent seduced to the dark side by machismo.  He sees that Celine has a crush on Prithviraj and decides he should be like him, and therefore asks a friend to connect him to the drug world.  It’s all very sudden, the switch from a good boy struggling to stay good, to suddenly wanting to be bad.  Again, it’s close to right, we see how he is already in this world, can’t escape it even as he tries, his friends in school are on drugs or drug dealers because it is the world he lives in. But there is no hint of interest in it or taste for it until just now.  Most of all, the reason teens become drug dealers isn’t for “excitement”, but for money.  I would find his motivation much more reasonable if he was made aware of his family’s money struggles, if he thought of himself as some kind of savior who was strong and brave and could help them, that would be as young and dumb and tragic as his doing it for love.  And much more logical.

Nandhu, it’s mentioned late in the film that he borrowed money from Rahman to buy his garage and has been working off the debt since then.  That’s a pretty lame backstory, Prithviraj’s uncle borrowed money and Prithviraj has to work it off.  Especially since there is a reference in the very first scene to Nandhu’s arm being injured in service of Rahman, which is never fully explored.  His motivation, it just doesn’t really make sense.  Yes, he was a weak man who needed money, but I need more than that.  Have something like he killed a man by accident back in India and can’t go home again.  Or that Rahman helped them get into the country illegally and is holding the immigration authorities over there head.  Something more than a simple “I borrowed money and had my nephew drive around a little to pay it back”.

The biggest missed opportunity, Rahman as the big gangster.  He is given a clear backstory, escaped Sri Lanka as a teen with his little brother and nothing else, made it to Toronto and started a criminal empire, was thrown out of Canada and landed in Detroit and started over again.  There should be a lot of misery here, a lot of understanding of how tragedy creates villains, some sense of sadness behind him.  But, nope!  He’s just evil.  They give him that backstory, and then it doesn’t pay off in the rest of the film.

Everything except Prithviraj is like that, close to the mark but just barely off of it.  Even the directing is like that, I can see the director had actual training (part of his time in America was at the New York Film Academy), he is using the handheld digital camera natural light and natural locations style that is deceptively hard to pull off.  There are some moments of real beauty, he captures that feeling of driving around the empty streets in a powerful car which is so uniquely American, and so uniquely Detroit (a friend of a friend from Detroit recently came to Chicago, she had to go to a show downtown and had the option of parking for free and riding the train down, or taking her car and parking for $30-$50.  Didn’t even think twice, she was not going to be without her car).

But again, it isn’t quite what it could be.  Maybe it’s just a first movie problem.  Give him a chance to grow, to go a little deeper into his characters, a little deeper into his visual planning, a little deeper into crafting the plot, and Nirmal Sahadev could really be something.  But he’s not there yet.  Except in brief flashes.  But those flashes are awfully good.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Monday Malayalam: Ranam Review (SPOILERS), Just Barely Misses the Mark

    • Yep!!!! And I can almost buy it, I am sure there is a large drug trade and a lot of illegal immigrants coming over from Canada.

      On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:46 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

    • Yes! They go all in on it! The big showdown happens on some festival where they burn the spirit of summer? Do I have that right?

      On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:27 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

      • I saw effigy in the trailer and was thinking it’s the polish element, but we burn the spirit of winter, when the spring arrives.

        And how was Isha Talwar in this movie? I saw her in Thattathin Marayathu and “I love me”, and she wasn’t very impressive.

        Like

        • She was still not very impressive. But Prithviraj was able to elevate her performance. And she had the right look, very tall and frail.

          What’s the name of the Polish festival? They kept saying it in the movie and I was wondering if they got it right. Starts with an “M”?

          On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:41 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

          >

          Like

          • There’s no celebration in Chicago either, and if it was anywhere it should be here (tons of homesick Polish people looking for an excuse to party). I’m gonna guess the director saw a TV special or happened to be in Poland (or Russia or one of the other places) while it was happening. Because it is a great visual, the burning icon and all that, if you stumbled across it, you would definitely file it away for future use in a movie.

            It was used in the film the same way Eid or Christmas or Onam would be used, they just said “do this by Marzana” instead of giving a date and there was this big build up to it. I could see an Indian filmmaker wanting that sense of a holiday coming, plus the great visuals, and just landing on it. And then switching it from winter goddess dying for summer to the other way around to match the release date of the film.

            Anyway, now I know about Marzana! Film teaches so much!

            On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:54 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:

            >

            Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s