Sunday ReRun/Female Film Week: Anjaam, Madhuri as the Avenging Hero

This is such a good movie! In a very dark way, it puts our heroine through the wringer because that’s what can happen in India, all sorts of things happen to a woman without her doing anything to cause them.

I was thinking about it, and really every movie with Shahrukh and Madhuri except Dil To Pagal Hai is WEIRD WEIRD WEIRD!!!!!  They have co-starred 5 times, Koyla and this and Dil To Pagal Hai and Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam and Devdas, and none of those except Dil To Pagal Hai were really “normal” movies.

Image result for anjaam poster

(Not normal!)

Koyla, Shahrukh as a hardened mute action hero, Madhuri as a village belle who is tricked into marriage and then sold into a brothel.  Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam, post-marriage drama and love triangles and the whole thing took 5 years to finish.  Devdas, also took forever to finish, Madhuri doesn’t even show up until almost the halfway point.  Dil To Pagal Hai, happy romance with equal roles for each of them, NORMAL.

The big problem of course is that Madhuri and Shahrukh don’t actually make sense as co-stars.  Partly because they are both just magnetic over-powering charismatic on screen.  And having two people like that can overwhelm your film, the audience doesn’t know where to look.  But then, that is a problem that you can overcome.  Hema Malini and Dharmendra, Amitabh and Rekha, Shahrukh and Kajol.  There’ve been onscreen pairs of equal charisma before who somehow came together and made each of them better and brighter.  So I think it is more than that, I think it is something specifically about Shahrukh and Madhuri.

There’s the timing, for one thing.  I was very aware in this movie that Shahrukh was young and inexperienced and hungry, while Madhuri was making one of a dozen movies she was in at the same time, and solidly established in her career.  By the time Hum Tumhare and Devdas came along, Shahrukh was the top star and working hard to stay that way, he was polished and professional and passionate, while Madhuri was on her way out, doing a few perfect interesting little roles before leaving forever.  Koyla and DTPH are where they met in the middle, both at the top of the list and still passionate about their work.

But it’s also about style.  Madhuri is all Kathak in her acting, beautiful and graceful and elegant.  And Shahrukh is all method, rough and intense and kind of scary.  When he is opposite someone like Kajol or Rani, their acting is bracingly different from his, but it feels like they are still in the same scene together, still emotionally present.  When he is with Madhuri, it often seems as though they are in two entirely different movies.  They are in the scene together, but they are never quite connecting.

Just in terms of the Madhuri-Shahrukh chemistry, I always found Koyla the best representation of it.  Because Shahrukh, without his voice, is forced to perform with his body which makes him similar to Madhuri’s dancer-like acting.  And Madhuri, in her horrible action heroine series of tragedies, is required by the script to go through mental and emotional anguish to the extreme while Shahrukh remains (initially) removed from it.  And Shahrukh in a calm and happy character ends up equaling Madhuri in a miserable tormented character in terms of the emotionality of their acting.

But this movie might be my new favorite.  Because, whether by accident or design, it takes that disconnect between Shahrukh and Madhuri onscreen and makes it part of the plot.  They are two characters who never quite fully listen to or understand each other.


Just to start with the basic plot, Shahrukh is a spoiled rich boy who falls in love with Madhuri and creeps on her.  She marries Dilip Tiwari and leaves the country for 4 years, when she returns Shahrukh is just as obsessed as ever and hires her husband to work for him and drives a wedge between husband and wife.  Shahrukh kills Madhuri’s husband, but no one believes her, and then Shahrukh frames her as attacking him, telling a story that she was the obsessed one and wouldn’t let her go. Madhuri is sentenced to jail and while there her sister and daughter are killed (coincidentally by drunk driving Shahrukh) after her brother-in-law throws them out of the house.  Madhuri also miscarries after a beating from the sadistic female warden.  Finally she has had enough and kills the warden, then escapes from jail and kills her brother-in-law, then the corrupt cop who helped Shahrukh, and finally plans to kill Shahrukh himself.  Only to discover that the accident which killed her daughter and sister left Shahrukh a cripple.  She dedicates herself to caring for him, finally bringing him back to health.  He still wants to marry her, and his mother gives her blessing.  But when Shahrukh goes to her in a temple to propose, she declares that she only pretended to care about him in order to get him healthy so that she could kill him with a clear conscience.  After a massive battle, they both hang over the edge of a cliff and Madhuri lets go so Shahrukh will fall with her.  And they both die.  Happy Ending?

(Also, this song happens, which I’ve been told is essentially describing a rape, but in a disturbingly happy way)

It took me a while to figure out what was happening with this movie.  Similar to Darr, it’s easy to see the film as a stalker fantasy type situation, and only slowly do you realize that it is actually the heroine’s stalker nightmare, not the hero’s stalker fantasy.  But while Darr told the romantic fantasy as a nightmare, this goes beyond that and throws away the romantic option early on.

Before the opening credits, Madhuri is married to another man.  Shahrukh’s fantasy is clearly now impossible, because an Indian woman marries only once.  And part of what makes this film unique and unusual is that from that point on, nothing fits exactly with the standard fantasies.  Shahrukh can’t be the perfect dashing hero because he is breaking social boundaries by loving a married woman.  But Madhuri can’t be the perfect faithful wife, because she is breaking social boundaries by having a relationship with a man besides her husband (a relationship of hate, but it is still a bond outside of her marriage which in the restrictive Hindi film concept of a “good wife” is not allowed).

Instead, we enter a world of grey rather than black and white.  Madhuri returns, married, but her marriage isn’t perfect.  Shahrukh offers her husband money and her husband ignores Madhuri’s objections and starts working for Shahrukh.  They bicker, Madhuri is unhappy.  Her brother-in-law gambles and takes money from her as well, her sister is unhappy.  Shahrukh is doing everything right, sort of, but in a wrong way.  In a wrong way twice, first because he is using money and charm to try to win over a married woman (not a single woman, which would make his behavior the same as the hero of most other light love stories with misunderstandings and trickery).  And second because he himself just feels “wrong”.

This is a brilliant SRK performance.  One which I can appreciate more now than the audience probably did then.  Because now I have seen many many SRK performances and I know he has a set bag of tricks he tends to fall back on.  This role, there are none of the standard tricks.  He does a thing with his shoulder, raising one side and kind of twitching it, which is distinctive to this character, clearly developed just for this role, and never used since.  He also has a unique combination of facial expressions.  He wants to convey “silly naughty little boy” but to an extreme.  To a degree that is disturbing, to see this little boy having a tantrum in a man’s body.  It’s just plain wrong.  Not morally, but instinctively, it doesn’t feel like a right way for someone to behave, like seeing a dog walk on their hind legs.

This is also what adds a bit of another layer to his “stalker” character.  Because that’s all that stalkers, or most toxic masculinity, is.  It is childish little boy behavior in big boy bodies.  It’s supposed to be forgiveable or “cute” or “just how boys are”.  But, it isn’t!  It’s disturbing.  Adults should be adults, should be beyond those childish tantrums and demands and expectations.  And to see this childish Shahrukh character thinking he is in love with, and can force to be in love with him, the imminently mature Madhuri is just, well, gross!!!!  That’s the point of making her character he not just uninterested, but married with a child.  She is so far beyond him, in such a different place than he, to think of them together just highlights how unhealthy and immature and sick Shahrukh’s character is.

And then as the film expands, that sense of “wrong” is also expanded to all of society.  Madhuri lives within an imperfect world.  Her husband doesn’t respect her fully, her family can’t or won’t support her, this isn’t the usual “everything’s wonderful until the bad thing happens!” life of the thriller heroine.  It is only Madhuri that is superior, that is trying to do her best.  The police are corrupt as well, easily bought off by Shahrukh to lie and provide him with an alibi and instead convict Madhuri.  Society is corrupt, it is more willing to believe wealthy calm reasonable Shahrukh who argues that Madhuri was obsessed with and attacking him, instead of hysterical grieving unreasonable Madhuri shouting that it is all Shahrukh’s fault.  And even the jail is corrupt.

I had a moment of hope that, similar to Bandini, Aradhana, and 22 Female Kottayam, Madhuri would discover that jail was the only place where she could be free, by being removed from society she was escaping it.  But, no.  Instead, the warden is the terrifying Kalpana Iyer, who is having an affair with Shahrukh’s corrupt cop friend, and sells her convicts to wealthy men for the night.  She beats and abuses Madhuri, and Madhuri’s only support is from her fellow convict and friend Himani Shivpuri (who does an amazing job).  On the outside, Tinnu Anand, Madhuri’s greedy brother-in-law, throws his wife and Madhuri’s small daughter out of the house.  They are living on the footpath when, coincidentally, Shahrukh’s car goes out of control and kills them.  And finally, Madhuri is beaten until she miscarries.  And only after all of this does she turn to vengeance.

It’s not a matter of it being the last straw, it is a matter of it being the unsexed female avenger role.  A woman is a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother.  It is only when she has lost all of these identities that she is allowed to give up the world entirely and become something more than human.  It’s the same story we will be seeing with Manikarnika, Kangana’s Jhansi Ki Rani film.  The widow can either throw herself onto the funeral fire, or rise from it strong and angry and violent.  While Madhuri had anything at all tying her to the usual familiar role, she was weak.  But once she was freed of those ties, she became fearless and cold, a dispenser of justice.  And so, first, she found Kalpana Iyer and dragged her to the gallows within the jail and hung her.  Then she left jail to find her brother-in-law Tinnu Anand and killed him by, first, ripping out the veins of his wrist with her teeth, and then shoving money down his throat until he chocked.  And then the cop, the one who lied and gave Shahrukh and alibi, he found her in the cemetery over her daughter’s grave, she threw dirt from the grave in his face to blind him and run away.  Then let him catch her again and, as he was removing his pants in order to rape her, she stabbed him in the leg with broken glass before grabbing a sword, chasing him down, and killing him.

I give all these details not because they are awesome (although they are), but so you can see that these aren’t just the normal movie deaths.  Madhuri has gone from a happy homemaker to a brutal goddess-like unstoppable force.  Which is a not uncommon track for heroine’s to take in these films.  Heck, we just had this recently with NH10!

Image result for NH10

In American horror, there is the idea of the “final girl”.  We watch most of the film through the eyes of the killer, but in the end the “final girl” is wiser and stronger and better than the others, we start rooting for her, and she is the one who survives.  This is NOT that trope.  This is something totally different.  It’s not that Madhuri was surrounded by other women who were killed, and then finally once the audience bloodlust is sated, we cheer her survival.  It’s that the heroine has to lose everything important to her in order to unleash the power within her.  But once it is unleashed, it is unstoppable.

What makes this movie a little different is the different way Madhuri uses that power.  She has saved Shahrukh for last and strides out to see him carrying a knife, only to discover he is in a wheelchair, comatose.  And then her vengeance seems to be over.  She went from wearing modern colorful clothes, to the white of widowhood, to the black of vengeance.  And now she goes back to the softer colors, pinks and yellows and pastels, she smiles and laughs and dances and slowly brings Shahrukh back to life.

Only for us to discover at the very end that this was all a game as well.  Just another one of her many weapons.  She literally throws off the light white to reveal the dark block underneath in their final confrontation.

This is a great role for Shahrukh, but it is Madhuri’s movie.  A woman’s picture.  Maybe that’s another reason it worked so well to have them act together in this. There was no jockeying for position, no balance.  Shahrukh was the villain, Madhuri was the hero, and Madhuri was the one with all the power in the end.

Image result for anjaam madhuri

17 thoughts on “Sunday ReRun/Female Film Week: Anjaam, Madhuri as the Avenging Hero

  1. Well, I now know what my next movie will be. That was a fascinating read, even if I now know what’s going to happen. It matters not.


    • Watch out, Shahrukh in this isn’t just “sexy bad” but actually hateful. Although it’s also a fascinating early performance from him, so that’s fun!

      On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 5:53 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:


      Liked by 1 person

      • Oh, and of course there are plenty more scenes but the one where he beats her up, she proceeds to spit in his face which prompts him to call the police and report murder… then kneeling down in front of her, forcing her to injure him… that whole scene was perhaps the worst, or that if her having to identify her daughter. This is so sick. Convincing and disgusting and brilliantly played.


        • YES!!!!

          And let me direct you back to this post if you haven’t read it:

          Darr and Baazigar and Anjaam all have been critiqued as being “anti-feminist” because the hero is a stalker. But to me it is so clear that Shahrukh is supposed to be a monster, his performance is that of a monster. The role is written to make him a hero, and he certainly doesn’t play it in an heroic way.

          And seriously, you HAVE to watch Fan. If you thought this performance was good, that one is going to give you a heart attack.

          On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:43 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:


          Liked by 1 person

          • I haven’t read that post yet, I don’t think. Will do that shortly.

            I have seen Darr and loved it. I didn’t see any anti-feminism, but I did see a lot of real-life probability because these kinds of people are quite real and exist. I didn’t see a hero either? A protagonist, obviously, but there wasn’t a trace of heroism anywhere. He was described and acted as a pure psychopath in no uncertain terms. There wasn’t a single redeeming quality about him, nothing even remotely heroic. What made me not wish death upon him as fast as Vijay is merely owed to the fact that his abuse wasn’t quite as brutal physically. I would have been okay if he had been imprisoned for life instead. But Vijay? Vijay had his fate set right from the start.

            I have yet to see Baazigar and Fan. I think Fan will be next. The trailers and teasers are very promising. And the song Jabra! I did see the „Making of“ and felt for him as he limped his way through the streets of New Delhi. I love that song (in all languages) and his silly improvised dance. Reminded me of his quirky ways during the 90s.


          • What I argue in the article I linked is that people think of him as the hero of Darr and Anjaam because they can’t break out of gender concepts. To my eyes it is SO CLEAR that Juhi and Madhuri are the “heros” of Darr and Anjaam with Shahrukh as the villain. Right? And their husbands are the love interests. But the Indian film concept is so locked into gender roles that of course the lead male actor has to be the “hero” and the actress is just the “love interest” never the “hero”.

            Anyway, yes, you must watch Fan. It is probably the greatest performance(s) he has every done.

            On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:03 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:


            Liked by 1 person

          • I will agree if there’s a need for a hero / heroine at all. I would argue that both of these films neither contain a hero nor a heroine. Juhi is way too passive in Darr to be a heroine for me. She doesn’t really do anything to be deserving of that description toy mind. Same goes for Shah Rukh and Sunny Deol, the latter maybe coming the closest to being a hero because at least he tried.

            In Anjaam it’s abundantly clear that Vijay is very, very ill and he is shown as such in the most unapologetic way possible. I don’t see Shah Rukh injecting any kind of charm or something else that would tempt me to second guess my initial impression of him, either.

            As for Madhuri, this is very subjective of course, but I don’t consider revenge a hero/ heroine like quality even if classic drama disagrees with me. I definitely did not want her to die and it broke my heart. I also understood that she likely had lost any reason to keep on living after having lost all that she loved. But a heroic character? While somewhat understandable, her revenge spree was ugly. And to prep someone up only to finish them off is vile and made me strongly dislike her as well, all sympathy for her pain aside.

            But yes, I guess if there needs to be one heroic character, then she would come closest to it.


    • It really does! Madhuri as someone with no interest in Shahrukh makes a lot more sense than when they are passionately in love.

      On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 9:46 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  2. I watched Anjaam tonight. I’m still somewhat terrified by it. Wow, what a „tour de force“ acting mastery by Madhuri and Shah Rukh. I mean, even that early scene with the „non-birthday“ cake and the back and forth spite and mockery. And his face with that piercing, insane stare when they degrade him and that shoulder spasm and the trembling and fumbling fingers while trying to light a cigarette…

    Oh my…

    And it’s not like the intense acting scenes end there. The airplane scene and how he acts when she ushers him to stay quiet and how he reinforces her command by semi mimicking it… wow.
    It doesn’t end here either. I don’t know but right now this is one of my favorite movies, perhaps even above Dil Se, which was my favorite along with JHMS so far.

    There’s so much to explore that I don’t know where to begin. What I can say outright is that I’m in awe of what Madhuri and Shah Rukh do in this film. It’s jaw-dropping, superlative craftsmanship and equally terrifying and haunting and depressing and just a nightmare. A true nightmare nobody would wish upon their most dire enemy. And they are so believable. I neither recognized SRK nor Madhuri. They fully took on the characters they portrayed and left not a single trace of their non film personae, sometimes to my dismay as it would have reminded me that none of this is real. Wow.

    I think I want to start an SRK YouTube channel, somehow.


    • Shahrukh’s early movies are so raw and powerful. He was trying anything and everything, taking any interesting role that came his way and throwing himself into it with a manic intensity. I think he is a far better actor now, more controlled and subtle, but there is a kind of passion in those early films that is lessened somehow.

      On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:35 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



      • He definitely has more experience and versatility now. I don’t see his intensity lessened now but I feel he can control and distribute it much better now. JHMS is super intense to me, though not exceeding the confinement the role entails.

        But yes, I love the rawness of 90s Shah Rukh. The energy and despair and immeasurable devotion and dedication is fascinating to observe and also kind of endearing. I can’t help but smile. A perfect example are his Duracell battery jumping and falling around in most of the songs foe Ram Jaane. I have not seen the movie yet, just most of the songs and I honestly cannot begin to explain how much I love Phenk Hawa Mein Ek Chumma. I don’t know why I find this song along with his behavior in it so addicting. It just is maddeningly fun and sweet. That scene when he stands on that rock with the way too big suit (like almost always during that time) and the way he like waves / rocks his arms around. It cracks me up. The whole song. He’s sexy in the most quirky way possible. And I’m a child of the 80s, so those tunes are pure childhood memories too.

        I seriously wonder what a Anjaam 2.0 would look like with the same leading actors.


        • Oh wow, that is a really intriguing thought! I think it would be a wonderful interesting film to have Madhuri be a middle-aged wife and mother who gains an insane stalker from another middle-aged man. Because it happens, not young and perfect women can be stalked. And I want to see that film play out!

          Liked by 1 person

  3. When I watch Madhuri & Shah Rukh in films together I feel as though she is his mother. She is so poised, graceful and elegant, versus Shah Rukh’s giant ball of unrestrained energy. Their clash did work better in this film than others, but I typically watch Shah Rukh Khan movies for the amazing chemistry he can create with co-stars; I’m always disappointed when his co-star is Madhuri. While I don’t love their pairing, I do love Madhuri’s dancing. The Chane Ke Khet Mein song with his shocked, lustful, and hurt anger gaze always in the background is fantastic.


    • Feeling like she is his mother, that’s a great way to put it! I don’t have that feel with her with other co-stars, but I really do with Shahrukh. Maybe also because they co-starred later in her career? In her earlier movies she felt younger, less confident onscreen, more fragile somehow. At least, to me.

      On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:07 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.