Friday Classic: Talvar, The Middle-Class Pinched From Both Sides

What a fascinating frustrating movie!  Based on a fascinating frustrating real life case.  Which, I am sure, many people in the comments already know much more about than I do.

This is a hard film to discuss and decide what makes a “spoiler” and what doesn’t, since it so closely follows the real sequence of events.  So I think I am going to give a very brief discussion of artistic style and quality and then leap into the SPOILER section right-quick.

Irrfan Khan is what makes this movie work.  It’s a dark tricky confusing story, but Irrfan is there being calm and reasonable and intelligent at the center, if you can just hold on to him like a talisman, it will all turn out okay.  And I don’t think any other actor could have played that role in just the right way, underplaying it like an art actor but still holding the screen like a Star.

Image result for talvar

Konkona is on the other end of things.  While Irrfan is the calm and reasonable respite, Konkona is the mass of misery that torments the viewer to watch her.  Which makes sense, her daughter has just died after all.

And they are surrounded by an able group of supporting roles.  Neeraj Kabi does a decent job playing the tormented father.  Prakash Belawadi as the wise mentor/boss to the inspector.  These are all familiar roles done well.

Besides Irrfan and Konkona’s performances standing out, it is really the directing that is the most impressive.  Meghna talked about this movie as a “Rashomon” type film, where we see the same story multiple times over.  But what she doesn’t say is that it is a true Rashomon film, meaning there is one clear “true” version.  Meghna expertly juggles the original police investigation, the two subsequent investigations, and the various versions of the crime that are shown as the proposed solution based on the investigations.  She also shows a strong sensitivity to the people involved, real people after all.  Not so much through what was included as through what was not included.  For instance, we don’t learn that the victim had a boyfriend until a tossed off comment close to the end of the film.

But the true craft is how, while seeming to give us multiple options, Meghna steers the audience towards one conclusion, tricking us into thinking we got there on our own.  Irrfan is the character we start and end with, Irrfan’s story gets slightly more time than the other investigations, Irrfan just seems to care more than the others.  No matter how much she may say it is up to the audience to decide, it’s a rigged game, she knows what we will all choose to conclude.

 

 

SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS

 

 

 

 

 

This is based on a real life case that my desi readers are probably sick of hearing about and know far more about than I do, but which will be new to my non-desis.  So, for the non-desis, here are the bare outlines.  Arushi Talwar was a 13 year old girl.  She was found one morning in bed with a wound on her head and a slit throat.  Her family servant was missing, a middle-aged Nepali man.  He was immediately assumed to be the murderer, but then his body was found the next day on the roof terrace of the building also with his throat slit.  Arushi’s parents were home the entire night and claimed to have heard nothing and have no explanation.

The original murder was odd.  Tragic also, obviously, that’s part of this, the tragedy of a 13 year old girl dying so horribly.  But it was just odd, that she was found tucked into her bed, that the servant was found on the roof killed in the same way, those were features that immediately caught your attention.  However, what made it into a true cultural event is the same thing that makes all of these “mysterious” murders into cultural events: Police Incompetence.

20180523_211746.jpg

(Police incompetence depresses me, so here is a picture of Dog Hazel to cheer us all up)

This was not a perfect crime.  There was blood everywhere, including a bloody handprint on the roof of the building.  There was no doubt clear evidence of who committed the crime somewhere in the apartment.  The problem was not that the murderer was too brilliant to be caught, or that the crime was too mysterious to be explained, the problem was that the crime scene was corrupted to such an incredible degree that any definite answer became impossible to confirm.  Reporters were allowed in to take photographs while the investigation was underway, evidence was trampled or else purely unusable.  According to later investigators, 90% of the evidence was destroyed by the original investigators allowing mobs to trample through the crime scene.  For instance, the bed sheet Arushi was found on somehow disappeared, along with any DNA evidence that might have been on it, including a “wet spot” that multiple people remembered seeing under her body.  That is what made this case a “mystery”, not a lack of evidence or explanation, but rather the destruction of that evidence which could have made the explanation obvious.

The other thing that makes it both a problem to prove, and a public obsession, was the way it intersected multiple social forces roiling through the country today.  The murder took place in an affluent suburb of Delhi, a new affluent suburb.  The community was full of 3 separate forces, the original residents who were struggling to adapt to the new urban reality (this would include the original investigating police), the educated upper middle-class newcomers (Arushi and her parents and their friends), and the poor servants immigrating in to work for the middle-class (Hemraj, the servant also found dead).

(City of God deals with the same reality, it’s what India is today, workers traveling from other regions of India/South Asia in order to serve the new middleclass who are rapidly expanding and pushing out the traditional residents)

The result was a complete clash of understanding.  Arushi’s parents were quickly believed to be sexual deviants participating in wife-swapping, Arushi herself was identified as a sex mad teenage girl with too much freedom, Hemraj was a predator preying on the teenage daughter of the house where he worked, and the police were over their head and incompetent.  Or, Arushi and her parents were “better” people, too intelligent and modern and all that to be fully understood by those around them, Hemraj was a poor struggling villager preyed upon by his employers, and the police were noble dispensers of justice.  It all depended on who you asked.

Meghna, in her fictionalized version, choose to take these conflicts and focus them down on the police investigation.  The title of the film seems a little cheeky, “Talvar”, but not meaning the real life people, no no, this film is about the murder of “Shruti Tandon” and “Khempal”.  But late in the film there is a discussion of how Justice is scales and a sword, sword being “Talvar”, and the police are the sword.

This is not a story about the Talwars, the real life family, this is a story about the police officers who investigated them and who they are.  That allows for all those fascinating problems of society to come to the surface, but in a new way, not the same old case that the audience for this film has already chewed over again and again.  It also allows for the “Rashomon” effect Meghna wanted, each investigative team coming to their own conclusions and their version being shown in flashback.

But each version is not truly equal, just as each investigative team is not treated equally by the film.  Irrfan is at the opening, his reassignment to the case is what starts the film.  More details of the original investigation come out as he talks to the police who carried it out.  And after he is removed from the case, he is brought back at the end to talk it over with the team that replaced him and challenge their theories.  Plus, it’s Irrfan!!!!  The biggest name in this film, and the biggest presence (well, maybe tied with Konkona).  Obviously he is the one who is going to get the audience sympathy.  And so among the police, he is the one we sympathize with.  And Meghna skillfully creates another layer of 3 societies within the investigation, lower and middle and upper, above the victim and her family, a whole other layer of society on top of them.  Irrfan is in the middle here, and he is punished for it.  And that reveals the ultimate theory of the film, that the Tandon/Talwar’s were punished for their middle-class status, trapped betwixt and between and hated by all.

(Another movie dealing with changing India, in this one our new middle-class kids just decided not to care and enjoy their lives even if the rest of the world didn’t understand)

I am aware this film has a particular argument, no matter how much it pretends it does not, and I have not down much research on the original murder so I don’t want to appear to be presenting any opinion of my own.  So this is a disclaimer, everything I am about to say is the murder and investigation is AS THE FILM SHOWS IT.

We start with our original investigative team.  Crude, accented, chewing paan the whole time.  They don’t bother searching the terrace even when a neighbor points out the blood on the lock and the stairs, they let the mattress be taken out of the murder room, and they assume it is the servant and, when he is found dead, almost immediately arrest the father.  With the explanation that it must have been an honor killing, he found his daughter and servant in bed together and killed them both.  Except this film, because Meghna is so sensitive, avoids even repeating this story and leaves it at “honor killing” for unspecified reasons.

As this film presents it, the leap to “honor killing” was part of a pattern of this police team simply not understanding how middle-class families such as this functioned.  Neeraj Kabi, the father, tells them he was planning to let his daughter have a sleepover with her friends for her birthday, and the term has to be explained to the inspector, who insists on taking the most scandalous view of it.  He also jumps on the assumption that the couple is participating in wife-swapping, or possibly just an old-fashioned affair, with another couple, their best friends and business partners in their dental clinic.  He is encouraged in these assumptions by Sumit Gulati, a worker from the same village as the dead servant who also works for the Tandons in their clinic.  Sumit happily claims that Neeraj and his business partner are having an affair and the police and he have a good laugh over it.  The police are enjoying the idea of putting sexual deviances onto those they don’t understand and resent, and it leads to a massive jump with no evidence towards Neeraj as the killer and Konkona as his assistant in covering it up.  They believed the worst sexual excesses of the rich people, but weren’t able to expand their minds to a father who would not react to his daughter having sex by killing her.

(I know Neeraj from Byomkesh Bakshy!, another movie that does a great job investigating how one crime can show everything happening in a city)

And then there’s the second team.  Irrfan, brought in when there is no evidence to convict the parents.  He starts fresh with tests and evidence collecting and staging and recreations.  The original theory of the crime is obviously false.  The two of them couldn’t have been killed in the same room, because there was no blood found from the servant Khempal.  And there is a memory by one of the police officers of multiple glasses and drinks in Khempal’s room, as though he had friends over that night.  Based on the minimal evidence available, Irrfan lands on the idea of the servant and his friend Sumit Gulati and another Nepali worker as involved.  Essentially, the butler did it.  He uses truth drugs to get confessions from them all, they got drunk and started talking about the teenage girl down the hall.  Khempal, the servant, objected because he saw her as a granddaughter, but the two younger men overruled him and dragged him into her room where they hit her on the head when she screamed and then it all went wrong.  Khempal objected, they chased him out and killed him too.  It matches the evidence, and it matches the prejudices.  The invisible ones that Meghna Gulzar isn’t showing us because that is her artistic choice.

Irrfan is middle-class, intelligent, modern.  He likes to test things and move slowly before he builds a conclusion.  And he understands the world the Tandon/Talwars live in, he doesn’t assume that a man and woman must be having an affair if they are business partners, and even if they are, he doesn’t assume that is necessarily a problem.  He himself is going through a divorce from a wife he still loves (Tabu).  We see them in divorce court, Tabu gives a long poetic discussion of the death of their marriage while the judge listens uncomprehending, and finally Irrfan jumps in and says “Also, infidelity.  Lots of infidelity.”  He’s not telling the truth, but he is telling the truth he thinks this blankfaced judge will accept.  That is how he feels about the Tandon/Talwars and the police investigating them.  He knows that the police wouldn’t be able to listen or follow what they were saying, he sympathizes with them as another person who lives in a different world than most Indians.  And so Irrfan is prejudiced towards them, and away from their servants.  He looks for evidence to exonerate them and find another murderer.  And he finds it, the evidence is there from both sides.  And Meghna wants us to believe him, wants us to see that Irrfan and the Tandons are being punished for living in a different world than the rest of India.

The message becomes clearer in the final investigation.  Irrfan loses his understanding intelligent boss and inherits a new one who wears an ascot and a mustache.  He screams old-money and old-power.  And he rejects the evidence Irrfan has found, taunting him for having been distracted by his personal life (the divorce with Tabu) and pushing too hard on this case.  The truth serum testimony is inadmissible and without that they don’t have enough to go to trial.  Irrfan’s investigation is over, they are starting from the beginning again.

Image result for irrfan tabu

(They are so cute together!  I want them to be a couple over and over again)

And so the third group of police appears, the top of society, the ones even above the Irrfan’s and Tandons of the world.  And they are there to protect the status quo.  The initial investigators may have made the mistake, but they can’t have Irrfan and the Tandons coming together and outsmarting them, taking their power away.  The new investigator is a grandfather who casually brings his grandson along with him while he investigates.  He also brings a prosecutor with him from the start, he knows how to play the system and get the powers on his side.  And instead of Irrfan’s approach of careful evidence gathering and consideration, he strolls through the crime scene, talks to a few witnesses, and builds up his own version.

The film brushes past this investigation a little, but he does actually pull out information Irrfan missed.  Most notably that all of Irrfan’s suspects have alibis for that night, and the night watchman did not see any of them enter or exit.  Irrfan used his smarts, this new investigator uses his pressure.  He gets witnesses to shift their stories, or bring out new stories they hadn’t told before.  The film leaves it open, never comes right out and says that he is influencing the witnesses, that he is ignoring evidence to built his story.  But it comes awfully close, he says straight up that he gets a feel for a case and then builds it based on that.  And it does not say that Irrfan might have been doing the same thing, coming in with a subconscious liking for the Tandons and trying to find evidence to save them.

The last investigator comes up with a slightly changed theory.  Rather than an “honor killing”, he suggests that Khembal might have been attacking the daughter.  And in the heat of the moment, when Neeraj walked in and saw them, he hit out wildly and hit his daughter by accident.  The rest of the night was an attempt to cover up this accident.

And then we get the scene the whole film is building towards, the confrontation between the cops.  Irrfan and his old boss brought in on one side of the table, facing down the new investigator, the prosecutor, the new boss, and Irrfan’s assistant who has changed sides as well.  And they know they are going to lose.  They present their evidence, but they focus more on needling the other side, making them doubt themselves, making them weaken just a little.  And it works, the ultimate decision is that the official line is still “the parents did it”, but the case will be closed for lack of evidence.  Not a great resolution, but at least better than actually taking the parents to trial.

That feels like the culmination of the film, the moment of enough doubt to stop the case.  Meghna keeps going, because she has to, because the story didn’t end there in real life, but it breaks the films natural build.  This is where it should have ended, with Irrfan’s minor triumph in putting in one little crack of doubt between the upper and lower classes that are pinching the middle between them.  That is the story this film is telling, the lowerclasses who can’t understand the new middle that has sprung up in their midst, and the upper classes who can’t handle these new people succeeding on merit and challenging them.

(Also what VIP is about, the talented young graduated who isn’t willing to fall back to a lower level but is being blocked from a higher level by entrenched forces)

But Meghna has to keep going and so we end with the depressing message that it wasn’t just two sets of police who hated the middle-class Tandon family, it was the whole country.  We get just a glimpse of the ridiculous TV specials, arguing that Konkona isn’t upset “enough” based on her TV appearances, perhaps there should be a DNA test to prove whether or not she is “really” the victims mother, with the incredibly old-fashioned assumption that a mother by blood would never be capable of harming her daughter, and a mother by adoption could never truly love her child.  But it’s enough to give us a sense of what was happening.  The Tandon/Talwars were turned into a scapegoat for everything that was wrong in the country, turned into chameleons of hate, becoming whatever you wanted them to be.  And the amazing morphing evidence and theories coming from the police just helped with that.  The end result was a couple who may or may not have been guilty but were put in prison more because of public opinion and the needs of the nation than anything else.  True “scapegoats” in the classical sense, sacrificed so that the rest could survive.

Image result for scapegoat

And Irrfan became the scapegoat of the police department.  His evidence ignored, dismissed as fantasy as a result of his marital problems.  On a small level with much less loss, but there is a reason we end with Irrfan miserable on the couch watching the Tandon/Talwars be sentenced.  They are the same, both of them with the illusion ripped away that they live in a fair free country that will let them live their lives without being crushed between the opposing powers of the multiple people below them and the multi-powered people above them.

23 thoughts on “Friday Classic: Talvar, The Middle-Class Pinched From Both Sides

    • So far as I can tell. And it looks like the case against the parents was overturned in a way that still implied they might be guilty. So it’s still open, you can believe the parents did it or that someone else did it or that aliens did it.

      On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 8:32 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

        • Yes, and once again it was police incompetence which turned it into such a big story, first their failure to have a complete investigation in a patient careful way, and secondly their willingness to allow the media access.

          At least with Jon-Benet it never reached the point of actually sending the parents to prison, that makes me feel a little better about the American justice system.

          On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:22 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

          >

          Like

      • That’s not correct. The case against the parents were overturned saying that its baseless & not enough evidence to hold them guilty. There was not enough evidence to even charge them with as admitted by the CBI. But the CBI judge still ordered the parents to be charged & the trial judge sentenced on circumstantial evidence. The high court had strongly criticised the trial court judge & even called him a ‘film director’.

        Like

        • Well that’s satisfying to hear! I’m glad it was overturned in such a way that their innocence seems clear.

          On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:50 PM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

          >

          Like

  1. Interesting review. It’s a compelling story, for sure, and my first film with Konkona. Thankfully my next film with Konkona was Luck by Chance, where she ends up A-OK. Ugh, the chemistry between Irrfan and Tabu is so amazing. I need to re-watch The Namesake.

    Have you seen Rahasya? It takes the same kernel of the story but then goes toward a more pulpy, tabloid, police/action style movie. But Kay Kay Menon has a very similar role and as much presence and star quality as Irrfan, as I recall. Kay Kay’s cop is less solidly middle class, but with middle class aspirations, and a wife who is impatient with his unwillingness to make a bit of extra income via a bit of light corruption. And they fully explore the boyfriend angle, but in a sensitive way. The parents definitely get raked over. It would be interesting to compare both, not as they relate to the real world case, but in terms of the way storytellers can go in pretty different directions with the same initial story elements.

    Like

    • Have you seen Aaja Nachle yet? Such a happy Konkona! Just warms the cockles of my heart.

      It would also be really interesting to compare the variations on the Talwar movies and the variations on the Nanavati case, the last time a true crime story got so many film adaptations. I wonder if 50 years from now the Talwar case will get a new version with something as ridiculous as the spy angle that was inserted into Rustom?

      On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:42 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

  2. I was one of those persons who followed the story on news back in 2011 & felt enraged at the parents for their ‘tactics’ to delay court proceedings-as the newspapers & tv news told me. But when I went deeper, realised that they weren’t really delaying or playing tactics, they were asking rightful questions which was made to sound as ‘tactics’. Social media had still not caught on & open letters, objective analysis were yet to be done on what was actually going on. The Wikipedia account itself was so conflicting & there was no mention on why so many things(read crucial stuff)changed & changed. Then sometime later a book called ‘Arushi’ written by Avirook Sen came out. This guy had painstakingly gone into details, interviewed everyone connected,sat through every court hearing of the case & referenced every public document. I have read excerpts of the book & it’s very similar to what the movie is telling. Even without buying into any sides, the book leaves some difficult questions for the Indian judiciary & the Central Bureau of Investigation. Particularly chilling is his interview with the lower court judge who had written the verdict of ‘parents to be held guilty’ before the hearing was completed.

    You mentioned police in the review but not the CBI who isn’t the oldschool, inefficient type of police. They are the country’s premier investigative agency. Also you missed the ego politics within the agency & in general within the beurocratic system which is why the new CBI chief appoints a second team that is so intend on proving the first team wrong. the final round table between the two teams presents a scary reality that it really comes down to which of the two opposing sides of the system is stronger & if you have rubbed them wrong. Evidence & proofs be damned.

    What I remember best about the movie is the last scene which shows the family together with the new camera just hours before Arushi dies. Such a normal family & then no more.
    There are some videos of the real Arushi in the YouTube & it’s so heartbreaking to see the whole family together in their happy times. This case is a simultaneous failure of the executive & judiciary in protecting the citizen-dead & alive.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: Friday Classic: Talvar, The Middle-Class Pinched From Both Sides — dontcallitbollywood – Business Startup-Bay Area

  4. I haven’t seen the movie (and I’m not sure I want to) but all this investigation reminds me about Meredith Kercher murder – very incompetent police, media circus, accused: a couple who was in the house and an emigrant guy, various trials and the fact we still don’t know the truth.

    Like

  5. Very nice review which made me think a bit more about a film I already think is brilliant. (I would watch it again, but I don’t think I have it in me). And I forgot it had Vicky Kaushal in it. I haven’t seen him in many things, but his career seems to be heating up and I’m excited to see where he’s going. Also, Tabu and Irrfan have such great chemistry. I wish they would do more stuff.

    Like

    • It’s such a frustrating movie, and such a frustrating true story. I appreciate that they made a film that was so clear and incisive in clarifying the problems, but that just makes it all the harder to watch.

      On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:48 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Like

  6. Hi, I haven’t seen the movie but I have seen the media trial while it was happening and it was the most obnoxious the media had ever been(it got much worse after that). I believe there are grounds for arresting certain TV anchors for the things they were insinuating throughout the trial. One man in particular who now runs his own channel so now we get to see more of him spouting vile, disgusting theories on issues that need balanced analysis…so yay! Does the movie emphasize the media’s role?
    Was this not based on a book that questioned the verdict?

    Like

    • The movie chooses to focus on the police but includes the media so that we can see how the media affected the police. Mostly the direct interference with their investigation, destroying most of the evidence as they walked through, and just a few clips to indicate how extreme they got in punishing the parents.

      But the movie starts with the terrible police, who arrested the parents on no evidence right from the start and allowed the media total access, which is what started the whole debacle. It really does seem like the two sides fed on each other, the police bringing in the media int he first place and then the media making the case impossible to investigate and coming up with their own theories that the police ended up following behind.

      On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 7:18 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:

      >

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Hey, I’m glad you chose to write about this film finally; I’ve heard it described as clinically perfect and I have to say I agree.
    Small correction though: Irrfan’s young assistant is played by Sohum Shah, I think he was in Ship of Theseus as well.
    Vicky Kaushal was in Masaan, Raman Raghav 2.0 and most recently, Raazi.

    Like

  8. Compared to the real life coverage of the event and the emotions we all felt watching the drama unfold, the film felt very lackluster. But i suppose we all watched it to get some sense of closure, like some form of definite leanings about what the filmmakers thought about who did it. Sadly, the film remained ambiguous on that, hence the frustration. Also, the Tabu-irrfan track really ate up precious parts of the screentime. There was enough original material for them to play with and this particular bit felt so foreign, specifically Hollywood inspired and so it felt more like a western male redemption film than the most shocking murder to have unfolded in front our eyes in this country.

    I find this analysis interesting. But I must add that even though our police seems grossly incompetent, and it perhaps is the least methodical in the whole world, it really has a good track record in identifying the perps within a few days of the murder and even catching them. And their instincts are quite sharp too. There’s actually an insider joke in the north at least that the cops know who did the crime but it’s always a matter of who they want to catch for it.

    There was no reason for this case to become “high profile”. It was just a dentist couple. Unless the investigating cops got phonecalls from their higher ups, they would have investigated it as they would any other murder case. But the way they fudged it and the way the media houses swarmed on the case made it look like a whole lot higher ups were connected to and involved in the case. That is where the plot thickens. IF the Talwars didn’t do it, then this highly educated, well-connected, well-informed family would know exactly how important it is to preserve the crime scene. It really is as simple as that. They weren’t dum dums. The first or second phonecall made to a contact in the police would have resulted in that contact arriving at the crime scene and helping the family ensure no evidence is tampered with. This is how Indian middle class network works. This entire investigation, even if you didn’t follow the case, reeks of a coverup. And there’s a difference between a fudge up and a coverup. And at the end, the couple got out of jail because there was insufficient evidence.

    Like

    • This is similar to the speculations that went on like if they were truly sad, they would have cried more or ‘if they didn’t have anything to cover up, they would have opened the balcony door sooner & not cleaned the house so soon’ or if they didn’t do it, they would have heard the noise etc.

      Like

      • Well they did rush the cremation. For upper middle class doctors, that’s “off”. Sometimes the simplest explanation is an accurate one. Some of their actions just don’t make sense. Like the cleaning bit. It’s not like they didn’t have relatives they could bunk with or they couldn’t afford a hotel to stay in during the investigation. If you’re complicit in destroying evidence, you’re bound to have a finger pointed towards you.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.