Friday Classics: Sarkar, When is the Moment to Stop Watching and Start Acting

Such a good movie!  I always forget, and then I watch it again and it is even better than I remembered.  Abhishek is perfect, Amitabh is perfect, Katrina is dubbed, it’s just what you want!

The strange thing is, this should be a bad movie.  The idea of yet another Godfather remake, with Amitabh playing Brando and Abhishek playing Michael seems terrible cheesy.  Add on that it is directed by Ram Gopal Verma, the man who never met a scene of violence or sexual objectification he couldn’t love, and it starts veering over into “blasphemy” territory.  After all, this is the man who dared to try to remake Sholay.

Image result for sarkar poster amitabh

And yet, it works.  That’s the miracle of RGV.  Just when you are ready to write him off as a hopeless hack, so egotistical that he cannot see past his own desires and so perverted that those desires are shared by basically no one, he comes out with something brilliant.  The thing I tell people about RGV is that he makes one stone cold classic every 2 years.  The problem is, he makes 9 other movies in that same time which are just terrible.  For instance, he made this brilliant film with Amitabh, and then 2 years later their next film was a remake of Lolita (no!) in which Amitabh had a deep sensitive romance with a 19 year old actress (NO!) including an explicit kiss (yuck).  RGV is also the type to give quotes like this:

“Hi Sunny (Leone), I just hate that it’s your birthday because someone as beautiful as you should stay young forever, and your birthday reminds me that you are getting one year older. I hate it, I hate God for that.’”

“I really don’t know much about clothes, I’d rather look at women without clothes. (On women whether they look good in yoga pants or shorts)”

“I like women with a lot of curves. I don’t like model like women, they’re skinny.”

So, generally, he is someone I try to avoid because of that kind of nasty tarlike sensation when you accidentally step into his thoughts and can’t wipe them off.  But then he makes Rangeela.  And Mast.  And Kshanam Kshanam.  And Company.  And they are just so BRILLIANT that for a moment you start to think maybe there is something there, maybe he is a deep sensitive guy who just comes off as a disgusting person.  And then of course he makes a movie like this:

Image result for ice cream 2 poster

Starring a 21 year old trained Bharatnatyam dancer in her first movie.  You can see how well he used her dancing talent in the hit song video (sarcasm):


That was a whole little detour there, but I felt like I had to say it and give examples before I go on with the rest of this review.  RGV has gotten a bit of an international reputation as this brilliant auteur and so on and so forth based on his few brilliant movies, which makes it easy for him to keep making his terrible movies.  So I don’t want to contribute to that, if you are going to learn why RGV was brilliant in how he made this film, by golly you are also going to deal with the moral conundrum of whether his brilliance here excuses his skeeziness elsewhere, just like I have to.


Now, why is he brilliant here?  The most important way is how he strips down the family story to its basic level, and then tells it through glances, posture, brief moments of yelling.  There is more unseen than seen, which is how family disputes work in reality, no need to spell out what is wrong or why you are angry, you know each other well enough to understand it with just a gesture.  And using Abhishek and Amitabh for that, that is what makes it all really sing.  Because all they have to do is sit in a room together for us, the audience, to see an authentic difference between father and son, a wordless conflict and a wordless compromise.  Their very acting styles tell us their characters, Abhishek restrained and self-effacing, Amitabh effortlessly powerful.

Beyond the central 2, RGV somehow manages to get perfect performances from each of his actors.  Supriya Pathak has an almost wordless role, but her strong distinctive face and onscreen personality carry it along.  Kay Kay Menon is expectedly disturbing and childish but dangerous at the same time, a typical Kay Kay Menon role.  Katrina Kaif has just the right look for her role and, with Abhishek guiding her reactions and experienced dubber Mona Ghosh Shetty providing the dialovue, she turns in one of the best performances of her career.  Tanisha Mukherjee, in one of her first major roles, reveals a naturalness in her performance that reminds you of her sister Kajol and an arresting look on camera similar to her mother Tanuja.  Anupam Kher for a mere 2 minutes, but a perfect 2 minutes.  The rest of the cast is made up of TV actors, southern actors, and lessor known Hindi talents (notably Ravi Kale as Chander who defines in many ways the personality of Amitabh by showing what he has inspired in his followers).  All of them perfectly cast, perfectly costumed, perfectly directed.  This is not a group of interchangeable characters, henchman who just exist to give one liners and female relatives who are just there to scream and be in danger.  This is a collection of humanity each with their own motivations and goals and unique personalities.

The plot is also a miracle of construction.  Each character gets their own little build to their pivotal moments, the plot is made up of dozens of stories and each one is complete and meaningful.  While still being reasonable and logical based on where the characters started.  That was the main problem with the sequels, RGV knew where he wanted to go by the end but he hadn’t quite figured out the steps that would logically get him there.  In this film, it is more like the characters were driving him forward to where they needed to go and he just let them loose.

Oh, and then there’s the style of it!  This is not a consciously stylistic film, which is what makes it so stylish.  It feels like we are simply sitting quietly in the room watching people talk around us.  There are few fancy camera angles or anything else to take you out of that feeling.  And yet, subtly, the camera work is creating a tone and a mood.  Abhishek for instance is not often shown alone in the frame until the midway point of the film after which he is almost always the focal point.  Those characters who cannot be trusted are usually shown at a kilted angle.  Those who can be trusted (notably Amitabh) are shown head on.  Tanisha and Supriya are almost always in the background, not metaphorically but literally standing in the background area of the shot.  And the whole film is shot in tones of light yellow, black, and white.  The yellow, the sunlight, creates this sense of beauty and warmth but also power.  Not to mention being a subtle homage to The Godfather‘s famous warm lighting.  The black and white, that is the characters, Amitabh in black and Abhishek in white and everyone else in tones across the middle.  There are no songs, just one repetitive background hymn pounding us on, and no pauses in the narrative that would allow for songs.  We are pulled scene to scene by the editing and it is up to us to fill in the gaps, to understand fully what we have just witnessed.

That’s what this whole film feels like, like we are witnessing real events, and then the ending asks us to make our own judgements.  Who is Amitabh?  Is he good or bad?  What has Abhishek become, or what was he all along?  Is that good or bad?  The whole structure in which they are living, is it useful or destructive?

One thing that I was relieved about when doing this rewatch, the film explicitly rejects Hindutva.  A large amount of the iconography of it is clearly based on Bal Thackaray, who Amitabh personally admired.  But the film itself is explicitly NOT based on Bal Thackaray.  Amitabh’s character may have mala beads and read the Gita and so on, but Abhishek’s character is something different.  And while one of the enemies is Muslim, so is one of the closest allies.  Religious differences and disputes are rejected by the film, Amitabh is a hero of the lower classes and that is all, and his enemies are those who would take his power away, coming from every class and religion.  In fact, one important character implies the falsehoods and evil of Hindu religious leaders.

Image result for sarkar poster 2005

(Not as Hindu as you would think!)

Now, that’s as much as I can cover without getting into SPOILERS.  Be aware, I am also going to SPOIL the sequels at the end of this section, because they are terrible and not worth watching but I want to talk about why they are terrible.  You can skip that part if you want to watch them after all.









Amitabh is a powerful figure in Bombay.  He’s not a gangster, more a decider, someone who protects people as needed.  That’s an important distinction from the original Godfather, where making these decisions was only half of the job and the rest was straight up crime and violence.  In Bombay, this is a legitimate possibility, someone who decides between right and wrong and guides his followers, who takes money from those who can pay for his justice-giving services and not from those who cannot.  And whose decisions are not for sale, who cannot be bought out.  The “real” government is so corrupted and inefficient, that a parallel government and ruler is not just possible, but required.

Amitabh lives in a big old house but he lives a simple life.  Also in the house is his daughter-in-law Rukhsaar Rehman, his small grandson, and Tanisha Mukherjee and her mother, daughter and widow of a friend that he has taken into his home.  This is a traditional household, the women do the cooking and serve the men, the men all eat together.  Amitabh reads his Gita and carries his mala beads.  But outside the house are men with machine guns strolling around.  The first scene perfectly establishes his life, the camera coming in and going through all these happenings and finally finding Amitabh, out on the balcony, listening to a helpless man describe the rape and torture of his daughter and how the police failed to punish the criminals.

This is the same opening as The Godfather, but different.  First, because the police truly failed, there was no justice here, there is no where else to turn and no one else to trust.  And second because in the middle of this, Amitabh gets a call asking him to approve a massive government housing scheme.  He is dealing with the small personal issues, and with the massive government issues.  And he is dealing with them fairly and seriously in both cases, they are equally important to him.  This is not a small criminal, or someone who puts on a show of being fair, this is true justice being meted out.

Image result for jalsa house

(The house is almost Jalsa but not quite, too old fashioned.  But with the same walls and gates and crowds around it, we are also supposed to be reminded of Amitabh the real person)

After that opening, we immediately leave The Godfather because we follow Ravi Kale as he goes to deliver justice instead of staying with Amitabh.  He brings with him some of the weightlifters we saw around the house, and he calmly and professionally walks them through what they need to do.  He tracks down the rapist, warns the rapist’s friends to stay back, and then directs his team with clinical precision in exactly how much to beat him up.  This is truly justice, this is not vengeance or anger, but a careful calculation of the right thing to do.

And only then do we meet Abhishek.  Arriving at the Bombay airport with his girlfriend Katrina, calmly strolling over to a car with armed men around it.  As calmly, at home, Amitabh remembered that Abhishek was arriving today thanks to Tanisha reminding him.  This is not a father and son bond made up of drama or emotion, but simple acceptance.

The stress is between Amitabh and his other son, Kay Kay Menon.  Kay Kay is a movie producer who spends his time on set, ignoring his wife and son.  Amitabh doesn’t force him to change but silently slightly implies disapproval.  He snaps at him during a dinner when Kay Kay suggests partnering with an untrustworthy person and then snaps himself back into control.  The grandson watches this innocently, implying that he knows his grandfather is no one to be feared.  Abhishek keeps eating, neither hiding his eyes nor looking closely.  Amitabh snapping at Kay Kay is apparently a common occurrence.

It is with Abhishek that Amitabh should be having these blow-ups, would be having them if he were the old-fashioned authoritarian father he first appeared to be with the traditional family structure and so on.  Abhishek arrives and Amitabh learns he has a serious relationship with Katrina.  Amitabh had promised his hand in marriage to Tanisha years ago, a promise made to Tanisha’s father on his death bed.  An old-fashioned father would be angry at being forced to break his word.  Amitabh is also new-fashioned enough to sincerely enjoy Tanisha.  He likes laughing with her and teasing her and playing games with her.  We can see he loves her and her mother and he will be very upset when Tanisha’s heart is broken and this engagement is canceled.  And yet, he does not hesitate.  He finds a moment to calmly let Abhishek know that he knows about Kat, and suggest she be brought home to meet the family.  He trusts Abhishek enough to let him make his own decisions.

Image result for katrina kaif sarkar

(Kat has the perfect look of casual fearless woman who is too rich to know when to be afraid)

That is what this film is about, ultimately, people being allowed to make their own decisions and reap their fate.  Amitabh issues justice after the crime has been committed, he does not necessarily try to stop it from happening, or worry about what is happening. Abhishek is a natural at doing the first part, observing and knowing and waiting, but this story is about his struggle to rise to the second, to be able to act when it is time to act and trust his ability to do the right thing.

The start of the film is about Abhishek holding back, watching.  Watching Tanisha let him go in a graceful little speech in which she admits she fell in loves with him, but never considered that he should also have free will in this marriage.  Watching Kay Kay grow farther and farther apart from the family, falling in love with his actress Nisha Kothari until in a jealous rage he kills her co-star/boyfriend.  Watching Amitabh decide on the right thing to do, banishing Kay Kay but keeping his wife and son with them, and then personally apologizing and swearing protection on Nisha if she testifies against Kay Kay.  Watching Amitabh be accused of assassinating Anupam Kher, the honest politician who spoke out against him.  He is always there, watching, not reacting.  The scene when Kay Kay is banished, the rest of the family has reactions, is upset, crying, something.  But Abhishek merely watches, and once the decision is made, he leaves the room because there is nothing more to see.

(Tanisha is really so good in this movie.  Such a shame she didn’t go on to a bigger career)

Abhishek watches, but that does not mean he is weak.  Amitabh knows that.  When he is arrested, it is Abhishek’s shoulder he leans on, literally leans on, as he walks out of the house.  And now there can be no more watching for Abhishek because there is no one else to watch, he is it, he is the one.

The audience spends most of the film watching as well.  We see things Amitabh and Abhishek don’t see.  We see the meeting of the conspirators, Raju Mavani as an MLA that Amitabh refused to support, Zakir Hussein as a drug smuggler from Dubai frustrated with Amitabh refusing to allow him access to the Bombay docks, and Jeeva as a Hindu Swami who hates Amitabh because, well, he’s just plain evil!  We know every step of their plan, we understand what is happening as Jeeva tells them that the idea of Amitabh must be killed before the body of Amitabh followed by Anupam’s assassination and the assassin pointing the finger to Amitabh.  We are watching, and interested, but not emotionally involved.

That involvement comes in a bravura moment when Abhishek suddenly slaps into place as our point of view character.  Amitabh is in jail, and Abhishek gets word that he will be killed that night.  He rushes to the police and begs them for help along with Amitabh’s loyal secretary Ishrat Ali (“Khan Saab” in the script, the most prominent Muslim character and the most loyal).  The police inspector laughs at him, Abhishek is furious, he rushes off to talk to Kota Srinavasa Rao, the southern gangster and Amitabh’s old friend who we previously saw charming the household when he came for a visit.  And Kota laughs at him as well, explains that he was behind the plot all along, he was sick of how Amitabh patronized him.  And now he will kill both Abhishek and Ishrat Ali.  In that moment, the audience is looking at Abhishek and Ishrat’s faces as the look in the guns and for the first time we are truly drawn into this story, forced to take their perspective.  Which is when Ishrat dives for the gun and tells Abhishek to run and suddenly we are finding ourselves watching Abhishek as he makes a mad run for life, ducking through the docks and hiding from the following feet.  And this is when he gets his theme song, “Govinda Govinda Govinda”.  It’s an odd song at this moment, it means “protector” (loosely), it is a title of power and it is sung in a driving powerful way.  But Abhishek is running for his life.  Where is the power?

(“Govinda” being a name for Krishna, who spoke the Gita and talked about when it is your Dharma to act rather than stand by)

The power is inside.  This is the moment the switch is flipped and Abhishek goes from witness to judge and jury.  No more begging for help, once he survives the run he goes straight to the jail and forces the guards to check on his father, managing to arrive just in time to stop the assassination.

This is how we saw Amitabh act as well, this is the kind of power this film teaches us is right.  Wait and watch.  And only act when you have no other choice.  But in that moment, do not be afraid to act.  Amitabh promised his protection to Nisha Kothari if she testified against Kay Kay, but he did not offer to exact justice himself.  As of that moment, the courts still had a chance against Kay Kay and it was not his place.  Abhishek was still learning, he had spoken up (softly) to defend his father against Katrina, chosen to stay in the country and help the family, but he was still hesitating to take his true place until this moment.

The rest of the film is about this new Abhishek and the challenges thrown to him as he is forced to make choices.  He chooses Tanisha, touched by her care for Amitabh and finally aware of her virtues and values.  He chooses to assign Ravi Kale to investigate exactly what happened and exonerate Amitabh from the assassination attempt rather than making statements and trying to sway public opinion.  And finally he makes his most difficult choice.  Kay Kay comes back to the family, swears he is a changed man, declares that the conspirators offered him whatever he wanted if he would kill Amitabh for them and he turned them down.  And that night Abhishek catches him at Amitabh’s bed, trying to kill their father.  He fights him off and then later, in cold blood, goes to execute him.  It was not done in anger, or vengeance.  It was justice that only he could decide and carry out, no matter how much it pained him as a person, he had to do it as the protector of the community and the family.

This is a brilliant alteration to the original Godfather.  In 3 points that build on each other.  First that the central powerful father character is truly no criminal, he exists in a world where the established forces of law and order are worthless and he fills in that gap.  Second that the hero’s turning point is not in a moment of violence enacted against others (Michael’s first killing), but in a moment of escaping violence and realizing the need to act to protect others.  And third that the conflict is not between the weaker brother being forced into a position he does not want by the death of the stronger more heartfelt older brother, but that the weaker brother is not weak at all and the older is not stronger, he has an inner strength to him that allows him to defeat and remove the evil that is his older brother.

These 3 changes, plus a structural change.  In the original, we watch this family closely and see their soft intimate moments, feel we know them, care about them.  It is only at the very end that we suddenly step back and see them for what they really are, become witnesses to their crimes.  This movie does the opposite, begins by holding us back, making us feel like an uninvolved witness, keeps us untrusting of their violence and darkness and so on, until the sudden flip at the end as we see them for what they really are, Good.


And that brings us to the ending.  In the original, it is the sudden reveal of evil.  In this, it is the price of good.  Abhishek kills his brother, because he has to, because there is no other choice.  And after that, he discovers he has to kill more people for the same reason.  The conspirators, ending with being there himself for the death of Zakir Hussain, outside of his city, returning him to the sea where he came from.  And then finally confronting the real brains of the operation, Deepak Shirke, the chief minister who had pretended to be Amitabh’s friend and support this whole time.  Abhishek is no longer shot head on, and he is no longer in white.  He is still in his western wear, not his father’s Indian style clothing.  And he identifies himself in this conversation as an atheist, not his father’s Hindu style philosophy.  But he is wearing a large black suit coat, his styling reminiscent of his father’s loose black shirts and draped shawls.  And he is sitting like his father, stretched out and relaxed, taking over the scene, instead of quiet and contained and waiting like before.

Related image

And that is how he is sitting in the end, in the final scene.  While Amitabh is out on the balcony still, enjoying the sunshine, scene by the people, laughing with Tanisha, Abhishek is inside, listening to a woman talk to him about how her children threw her out of her home.  Hearing testimony and preparing to issue justice.





Image result for sarkar raj poster

(They knew what people wanted to see, they put it right there on the poster and then ddn’t deliver)

This is such a great ending, and there is a clear place to go from here.  We want to see Abhishek move on to higher challenges, he has accepted his role now, what comes next?  Sarkar Raj, the first sequel, starts to go down a really interesting direction but is hampered by Aishwarya Rai.  The direction it wants is to say “you want to see what Abhishek will do next, he wants to see what he will do next, and the whole city wants to see what he will do next.  But what if it doesn’t happen like that?  What if that very expectation is what does him in?  And what if someone you never expected ends up being the real ruler?”  It starts out strong, Abhishek hears about a new power plant plan that he thinks will ultimately help the people.  Amitabh is against it because it means land reclamation, but Abhishek convinces him.  Only to learn it was all a trick, all along.  Along the way Tanisha is killed in a car bomb and Aishwarya the corporate type supporting the project becomes his new love interest.  And then just as Abhishek is figuring things out and preparing to fight the real enemy, he is shot while Aish watches and screams.  Their life together is over before it can begin.  But Aish carries on.  She confronts everyone, she works with Amitabh, and it ends with her sitting calmly in the living room calling for tea in her proper upper class way, running things while the other woman move in the background.

The thing is, it should have been Tanisha!!!!!  This is a story about the unexpected ones taking power because there is no one else.  Aish already had power, she was proper and rich and all the rest of it.  This film, the first film, established Tanisha as smarter than she seemed, and Amitabh’s most beloved and trusted child.  More beloved than Abhishek even.  If the second film was going to be the shocking twist of our central character dying partway through, then it should be followed by a surprising rise of someone else in his place.  The heartbreak of a love story unfinished, the power of a grieving widow, the surprise of the overlooked woman taking power, it’s all so much better with Tanisha than with a recently introduced character that has no firm place in the story.  And of course it only happened because Aish now had a place in the “real” story and RGV couldn’t resist playing out the husband-wife-father-in-law dynamic on film.


Related image

(They have to keep putting people on the poster to make us think they are part of the family, but they aren’t, just new characters for this film)

The third film, Sarkar 3, again, isn’t what it should be.  The central idea is good, an angry young grandson fighting with his grandfather.  Seemingly going against him because he is frustrated by his lack of action, and seduced by his girlfriend who has an old grudge against the family.  But in the end it is revealed Amitabh was working with his grandson all along, there was no rift, it was all for show to bring out the true enemies.  And it ends with Amitabh and his grandson Amit Sadh sitting down together to have tea and discuss power and how to control it.  But Aish is not here, which seemingly erases the second film.  And Abhishek looms over it all, literally through his photo on the wall.  It’s all unbalanced and wrong, Abhishek should have died at the start of this film leaving the power vacuum that Amit Sadh struggles to fill.  Or Tanisha should be running things and Amit Sadh be her child with Abhishek trying to over come his father’s shadow.  Most of all there should be other family around them, it can’t just be the story of grandfather and grandson, there should be more.  And there isn’t.  Whether it was a failure of imagination or casting, the whole rich family life we saw in the original film is gone, just down to two men.  How much stronger it would have been if it had been filled with all the characters foolishly expended in the previous films!

16 thoughts on “Friday Classics: Sarkar, When is the Moment to Stop Watching and Start Acting

  1. `
    I’m really sorry I read your background information about Ram Gopal Verma. I think Sarkar is brilliant and now I have creepy RGV in the back of my mind. It’s like the Woody Allen syndrome.



    • It’s very strange, because RGV is so creepy that you can’t ignore it in most of his films, and then there will be a movie like Sarkar where it is just completely removed, not even a trace of creepiness left.

      On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:26 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



      • See? Join me in my moral dilemma! I just want to spread the squick around.

        But this movie, in isolation, is brilliant and not squicky at all.

        On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:


        Liked by 1 person

    • Hopefully it will be a boring dinner so you will have lots of time to think. If nothing else, tell me what you thought about Kat-abhishek-Tanisha’s performances versus what you have seen them in before.

      On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:


      Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks for the cues! It was a good dinner, but I still thought of some things to say. One, and please no one get mad at me, but this is really the first movie where I was just mesmerized by Amitabh. I’ve seen Sholay, Piku, Black, Mohabbatein, K3G, Bunty aur Babli, that I can think of off the top of my head. Still so many of his iconic roles to see. And I’ve enjoyed him in most of them. But in Sarkar I really got his power and his subtlety. In the scene between Abhishek and him in jail, when Abhi says “I also know how to take care of myself,” and they clasp hands, Amitabh’s facial expressions and body language are just–*chef’s kiss*.

        As you say, the director got such great performances out of everyone. This is real ensemble acting. I enjoyed all of the supporting characters, especially Pushpa. What a great marriage, even if traditional.

        I did find the high contrast lighting and camera angles kind of gimmicky–one example being the shot where we’re kind of rotating from one side of the phone to the other while someone is pacing back and forth on the other side of the phone, giving a seasick effect–but I figured the shots that distracted me were “Godfather-y” and let it go. I often don’t even notice that stuff–I’m a lazy movie watcher–so I figure if they stick out to me, they must not be very subtle.

        Tanisha was outstanding, and I had no idea til I read this that she is Kajol’s sister. I agree with you–she is such a wonderful and naturalistic actress, as Kajol is. So interesting what you say about the sequels and what could have been with her role.

        I have only seen Kay Kay in Rahasya, and I was quite taken with him. But yes, he tends to make movies that I don’t really want to watch, being more of an escapist. He did full justice to the “Sonny” role. Do you think it was nurture or nature that resulted in his character flaws? Do you think the movie has a position on that, or just raises the question?

        Finally, Abhishek-wow! Especially in that role, playing against Amitabh. You said everything in your review. The differing acting styles, the tensions and resolutions between them, were just so good. I have a ton of respect for Abhishek for being his own actor, true to who he is, when both his parents are such iconic actors themselves. Of course he’s wonderful when he becomes the primary mover at the end of the movie–but his watching, waiting, and moving towards that point, are also really good. I liked his scenes with Kat. (As an aside, I know why she had to be dubbed, but I actually find her real voice one of the likeable things about her, so I missed it.) It tickled me that as soon as he decides to stay in India, his traditional rings and necklace are given more prominence–lots of shots of his hands, and moving up from the necklace to his face.

        The scene that really hit me with him is when he is running up the stairs when Amitabh is getting attacked in the jail. To me, that is pure acting. He was embodying all the emotions that character would feel, and the struggle to fly up the stairs faster than his body could really go, to get to where his father is, in a totally unself-conscious way. There was no “cool action guy” feeling about it at all.

        As you say–there’s just a lot that happens in the movie. I’m looking forward to a re-watch soon. And I will probably skip the sequels. 🙂


        • Like Brando, Amitabh is an actor that not every director knows what to do with. There is an immediate presence there, and he will show up to do the work (which Brando didn’t always bother with, sometimes just kind of sleeping through roles), but that extra magic really seems to depend on the director. Amitabh has worked with RGV a lot, usually in pretty terrible roles in pretty terrible movies, but I can see why he keeps going back looking for more of that Sarkar magic. Amitabh, at least, is still perfect even in the sequels.

          Tanisha comes from a great acting family, her aunt Nutan was the greatest of all, but there was also her grandmother and her mother and her sister Kajol. This was an excellent sort of sneaky debut performance. And then it fell apart. I don’t know why, but she never lived up to her promise here. It’s disappointing, because whenever she is ignored as just part of a famous family, I think about this performance and how outstanding it was and think that there really was something there at one time, it wasn’t just her family name and connections.

          Interesting question about Kay Kay’s role. I think The Godfather lands mostly on nurture with a little bit of nature for these questions. Sonny is naturally a caring guy, but he also never had to learn to reign in his emotions the way Michael did because he was always in charge and on top, the biggest brother. And he always had Tom Hagen and his father to clean up his mistakes, so he never learned to be cautious. But in this movie, I didn’t see it as much. Amitabh seemed to have a very hands off approach to his sons. Abhishek could pick his own career and his own wife and Amitabh would let him. And Kay Kay too, Amitabh doesn’t seem to have interfered in any real way with his movie career, or with his marriage, or with his wife. And Supriya (their mother) doesn’t seem to have been shown to be more indulgent towards one than the other. I think I would say the movie landed more on a nature side of things. Two sons, and one was just born not as smart, not as moral, as the other. The only nurture part of it was (as maybe Amitabh says?) he should have controlled Kay Kay better, protected others from him instead of letting him go his own way for so long. Now that I think about it, Kay Kay and Abhishek don’t even really interact like older-younger brothers. Yes in that Kay Kay is married younger and still lives at home, but there is no respect from Abhishek to Kay Kay or love from Kay Kay to Abhishek. And Amitabh never seems to treat them that way either, he doesn’t make a differentiation between babying Amitabh or treating Kay Kay as more than an equal. Fascinating since Indian society is so strongly built on older versus younger siblings, I guess it is a sign of Amitabh’s ultimate fairness that even between the two sons he makes no difference.

          I was thinking about all the “method” stuff from real life Abhishek could have drawn on for those final parts. I just rewatched The Godfather and it is in there too, Michael loving his father and worrying over him, and that worry being what draws him into the criminal world. But it feels so much deeper in this movie, I really believe in Abhishek panicking about his father’s safety, and being willing to do whatever it takes to save him and defend him, even from Katrina’s mild criticism. Abhishek in real life lived through his father’s accident and death and revival and the madness around it when he was just a small child (the scenes of Amitabh returning home int his movie were clear references to his leaving the hospital in 81), and he was raised in this culture of “must take care of your father before all”. That sense of Amitabh being this great misunderstood figure and Abhishek having his whole life wrapped up in taking care of him is straight from real life and must have informed the performances of both of them, don’t you think?

          and yes, skip the sequels!!!! Uch.

          On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 3:02 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



          • They did a really nice job of blending Amitabh’s real place in society with Sarkar’s in the movie. All of the scenes where he’s interacting with the crowd outside his house are great.

            Whatever process both A’s use when acting with each other, it definitely works. Even in KANK with all the cringeworthy scenes.


          • I have a hard time taking them seriously in Paa, but in B ‘n B and this one, it’s just seamless perfect chemistry. KANK isn’t quite as good to me, but it’s still pretty good.

            On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:52 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



          • They were battling uphill against some pretty weird scenes and crap dialogue in KANK. Their song together is so cute though! I haven’t seen Paa–not a fan of disease of the week movies.


  2. World Film History can be divided into Two parts ,Pre God Father and After Godfather.
    RGV has strong influence of Godfather ,he pays homage to Godfather ,for every few years.
    Before Sarkar, he has done Gayam . after Sarkar series , it is Rowdy.
    Even Devar Magan by Kamal has set Godfather movie in Rural Tamilnadu. very similar to Sarkar movie.
    RGV never tries to protect his image ,and strong follower of Ayan Rand’s Philosophy.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Just finished this last night. Tanisha is a revelation, especially in her kiss on forehead scene, just lovely acting there, but then I really liked her in Neal n Nikki too. When I saw this for the first time around 2005, I thought “Kat can actually act”, especially when supported by a dubbing artist that can also act. The scenes between IRL father and son were beautiful, especially the I’ve where they officially pass the baton, the mixture of emotions playing on BigB’s face were lovely.

    But this is the rare movie where it feels like the movie is fighting to become a work of art despite a director that is doing everything he possibly can to ruin it and turn it into a daytime soap. All the crazy lens work makes me think RGV spent months studying the 1960s Batman tv series to perfect his camera technique. A heavy handed score that signals you whenever something important happens, and sometimes just gets heavy handed for the heck of it. It feels like a film student just throwing stuff at the wall to see what would stick, trying to show off and use all that he had learned so far. I imaging RGV having a checklist by his side of all the film school tricks he wanted to use, and checking them off in the editing room as each was accounted for. Just a weird movie viewing experience because it makes you far more aware of the director than the movie while you are watching it.


    • Yaay, I am so glad you liked it! Tanisha was wonderful, glad to get confirmation of my impression. Her character was really interesting too, not stupid and not passive, choosing to let Abhishek go in her own way and not try to force him to her. I think that was something RGV didn’t expect, that her character and performance would be so different. And, if he had done what I think he should have, he would have leaned into that in the sequels. But no, he had to do his own thing.

      On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:50 AM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.