Super 30 Review (No Spoilers): A Movie About Poor People By Folks Who Have Never Met Anyone Poor

Well, that was a bad movie! In a frustrating way, because it is trying to sell a lie as the truth. I am fine with movies selling lies, that’s kind of what fiction does, but what bothers me is when it packages that lie as a truth.

I am not poor. But I have known poor people. Pretty much everyone has known poor people, there are a lot of them in the world. This film expects the audience to set aside what they themselves know to be true in order to believe in the story they are seeing. Not just believe through the magic of cinema while the lights are out, but believe as a true thing that happened in the world, that is still happening.

Image result for super 30 poster

At one point in this movie (set in 1999), our classroom of poor children who still received enough education to make them viable candidates for the IIT coaching class, is asked if they have ever seen a movie. Only two out of 30 have. And those movies? Sholay and Jai Santoshi Maa. Now, Sholay and Jai Santoshi Maa are record breaking hits and all that. But are we expected to believe that in all their years of life, these children never went to a tent theater, never went to the house of a friend with satellite TV, never scraped up enough money for a single screen ticket? Essentially, do we believe that poor people live in a different world from the rest of us to the point that they do not even know what movies are?

This is just ridiculous! You don’t have to be poor to know it is ridiculous, you just have to say to your domestic laborer “hey, what’s the first movie you remember seeing?” and if it was anything before 1999, this film is wrong. Heck, you just have to think back to the conversations you have surely had with laborers over the course of your life and consider how fluent they were in popular culture, probably as familiar as anyone else.

This movie presents the poor as though they live on another planet from the rest of “us”. It makes them into an “other” such that they cease to even exist in reality. Which is comforting, because if the poor are described in ways that makes them an impossibility, that means no one in reality is actually poor. Your driver, your domestic help, yourself, you are not “poor” because you know what movies are, you wash your face every once in a while, you have eaten in the past 3 days. By that standard, everyone is rich!

Do you dress and move and talk like these kids? No? Congratulations, you aren’t poor! Does anyone else you know or see on the street? No? Congratulations, there is no poverty!

Which brings me to the bootstrap myth. The bootstrap myth says that anyone can be successful if they just work hard, pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. This film suggests that the students of the class are the poorest and lowest of the low. But it also shows that they all successfully passed a rigorous entrance exam for the coaching class. Bootstraps, even the poorest can succeed if they just apply themselves. But, the poorest and lowest of the low could not pass that test. Not because they are stupid, but because they cannot read. Who are these magical unicorn folks who are too poor to eat food, and yet were able to get the vital first few years of education that allows them to pass a basic exam?

And then there is the whole idea of getting in to IIT as a proof of intelligence. No, as the ONLY proof of intelligence. There is a certain kind of smart that does very well on tests. There are many other kinds of smart that do well in the real world, or even in classrooms, but not on tests. If you have the kind of smart that does well in the real world, you don’t need IIT. Truly. If you have the kind of smart that does well in classrooms, you may manage tests and IIT, but you will be surely disappointed when you graduate and discover there is nothing there for you. And if you have the kind of smart that only does well on tests and not in classrooms, you don’t need a coaching class.

I feel comfortable saying this because I come from a family of engineers. In my family we have people who graduated from the #3 engineering school in the world, the #21 engineering school in the world, and the #44 engineering school in the world. IIT is positioned as this magical perfect best ever institution. But in reality, IIT Delhi is only the #111 best engineering school in the world. IIT Bombay is #168. The IITs go down from there, all the way to IIT Dhanbad at #587. They are good schools, yes, but to pretend they are the best in the world is to tell a falsehood, which insults the true achievements they have made over the years. And what is the even bigger falsehood is to pretend that the engineering school ranking really matters that much in the real world.

Image result for iit bombay
This is IIT Bombay. I toured it with someone I know who graduated from it. No air conditioning almost every where on campus, old tired looking buildings, and so on. It’s still a very good school, but this film specifically describes it as something that is not what it is. And again, that I find more insulting than simply telling the truth. It is a school that is #168 in the world, it doesn’t need fancy new classrooms and other money-wasting show pieces.

In my family, you know who was the truly brilliant engineering genius? The one who took himself from nothing into a business owner and wealthy man who left enough money behind him to help pay for me, his great granddaughter, to go to college? It was the one who graduated from what is now only the #229 best engineering school (even worse than an IIT) and was back then a charity school he attended on scholarship. Education does not make the man, the man makes the education.

This whole movie builds on the idea of the tension that after all their months of work, these kids could end up with nothing if they score just a few too little points and don’t make it into IIT. Doesn’t that, itself, show the flaws of this whole system? The entrance exam is supposed to test your knowledge and intelligence. Never does the film say that they are not gaining knowledge and have intelligence. Whether they pass the test or fail by a few points, they will still have the knowledge and the ability to apply it. But all that is good for is this test. Then, what is the test good for? If the knowledge needed to pass it is worthless, is not the test itself worthless? Is not the entire IIT degree worthless?

The IIT entrance is a golden ticket in India, a society where class and caste rule with an iron fist. Once you have that degree, you can be respected in rooms where previously you would be ignored. But a good boring elementary school education is also a golden ticket, and one that could and should be given to everyone, not just a magical 30 group of students. That’s what bothers me. This whole film is taking “deserving” poor people and giving them the thing at the end of the rainbow. But that thing is an illusion, a false pot of gold. The real value is in what they already had, the basic education that allowed them to read, to calculate, to understand the essentials before they even entered this classroom.

The movie says that Hrithik taught them how to question, how to think outside the box. Fine, great, but who taught them how to do simple math that allows them to even see the question?

It is a lie to pretend that the thing at the end of the rainbow has more power than it does. But it is also a lie to pretend that the journey started when the class started. If these kids already had the basic education needed, and the basic intelligence to pass the entrance exam requirement, they were not the poorest of the poor. A coaching class, no matter how good, cannot take the poorest of the poor and get them into the best engineering school in the country in a year. It can only take the richest of the poor, as it were, and get them into the best engineering school in the country.

This lie is so big, that it effects the whole movie. Every scene, every moment, is struggling to work around it. Our characters are made more and more pitiful to distract the audience from asking questions. Every moment of drama is underlined with music and emoting, because they know they have not given the audience a reason to truly feel anything. Hrithik’s central performance goes wildly from poll to poll in an effort to sell an unbelievable series of events. Heck, even the sound design and lighting are a disaster! In an attempt to sell “gritty”, they landed on “dusty and dark” and “weirdly breathy and wet sounding”.

The frustrating thing is, they didn’t have to tell the lie!!!! A movie about poor kids who had struggled, and their families had struggled, their whole lives to give them a basic education, kids who actually KNEW WHAT MOVIES WERE, I would still watch that. And it would be a movie with a color tone besides “tired dirty dingy” and characters who had more notes to play then “desperate and eager” and a hero who could talk like a normal person instead of an inspiring speech machine. And maybe a message that was more about the importance of free early childhood education, and child labor laws, and caste freedom, instead of about the All Powerful and Wondrous IIT.

8 thoughts on “Super 30 Review (No Spoilers): A Movie About Poor People By Folks Who Have Never Met Anyone Poor

  1. All reviews share this complaint, that it is not a movie about the kids but rather the person (hero) who is the savior of those kids

    In other words standard bollywood heroism packaged as a real world story


    • I don’t mind a savior story, so long as the kids aren’t so ridiculously over the top miserable. Airlift, for instance, (which I still think was a really good movie), we see that Akshay rises to the occasion, but there are people around him struggling and surviving as well. All humans are equal, one of them just happens to be the leader.

      On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:55 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  2. There is a perception Indian society that IIT matters, this is true from employment perspective, as they are amongst the top colleges in the country. Which is why we had movie such as 3 idiots which tried to say that education doesn’t matter as much as what you do/learn

    And if IIT matters, then coaching matters a lot, especially in a poor state such as Bihar

    Without coaching, if you attempt the exam it will be difficult but with sustained 1 or 2 year coaching it makes a difference of night and day to do well in these exams

    The IITs know these and so constantly tweak the exam and format to make it more coaching proof. It is like a constant race between IITs & coaching centres

    If you look at admission percentage of IITs, it is highly skewed towards urban centres that too certain schools in major cities because kids of these schools are well aware of coaching centres and so get a leg up

    It is a challenge for kids from semi urban or rural areas without access to such coaching to get the same ranking


    • And all of this says to me, if the pattern is so consistent, than the solution is not better coaching centers but rather to dump the exam altogether or reconsider the purpose of the IIT system. Is it to educate the people of India based on essential intelligence, or is it to reward the rich for having the money to pay for coaching?

      America is going through the same consideration on a lessor scale with our standardized tests. 200 colleges, including some of the top ten schools in the country have now dropped the standardized test requirement entirely. There is still a long way to go, but I would be fascinated to see what an Indian education system looks like if it was no longer test driven.

      On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:02 PM dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  3. That movie thing is laughable. Kids in 1999 would have most likely seen SRK or Salman movies, not Sholay or Jai Santoshi Ma. Where would they have even tracked down movies from the 70s if they don’t own a TV? They most likely would have foregone a meal or two and used it to buy a ticket in a single screen theater and watched a contemporary movie of their time.
    That Basanti No Dance video is pure cringe. I’ve tried to watch it a few times and I haven’t been able to finish it a single time. They are acting mentally slow, not poor. So bizarre.


    • Have you seen Dhanak? I love that movie, and it gets so many little things right, including their movie experiences. Our dirt poor rural little kid leads go with their uncle to the village, hours away, and watch a movie outside, and then go home. It’s a big event, clearly something that happens no more than once a month, but it’s a regular movie! And they talk about regular movies, Kick and Wanted and other modern new films. They see them later than in cities, and outside in a field, but they still see the same movies as the rest of India. They aren’t in some weird time warp where they don’t know things. Heck, posters! Even if you can’t afford the ticket, you still see the posters up and know what the concept of film is. That’s another thing in Dhanak, they study the posters for all these movies they didn’t see.


  4. And this is exactly why this movie will most likely work in India. It’s a culture centered around memorizing, preparing for tests and getting into IIT/IIMs. If you get in, you are considered smart and it is not just a golden ticket to a good-paying job, it’s also something that places you high in the arranged marriage market. Perhaps unsurprisingly, these IIT grads are the most obnoxious people you will ever come across. I have known 2 or 3 and they really are horrible, not smart at all outside their tests, with an outsized ego who look down upon everyone else. Most of them are also known to demand big dowries because they consider themselves a catch. They are real pieces of work. That alone should tell you how valuable their education is in terms of what kind of people it has crafted.


    • In America (and you have probably run across the same studies), they have found more and more that career success comes from good social skills more than testing. In other words, if you want your kid to really go far, sign them up for a team sport before you sign them up for extra testing classes. That is specific to American society, but that’s the IIT/IIM dream, right? Either a job overseas, or a job with a multi-national corporation. Either way you are going to hit the wall in terms of the value of your IIT education versus your co-worker who actually knows how to make pleasant small talk.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.