Spyder Review (SPOILERS): Closing the Technical Gap

What a great experience for my first Mahesh Babu film in theaters!  Not a great theater experience exactly (I was alone in there), but a great film to experience on the big screen, and to spend 3 hours of my life totally focused on watching. (No spoilers review here)

Whole plot in 2 paragraphs so we can get it out of the way and start discussing:

Mahesh Babu works for a government agency that performs legal wire taps only with warrants and in cases of national security.  Mahesh has designed a secret background program that picks up on fear or excitement or other triggers in voices on cell phones.  He illegally taps phones in order to find out about thinks like a child being kidnapped, or a young woman being tricked into an elopement, small scale dangers that he can stop.  One night, his program is triggered by a young med student talking to her friend.  She is, well, horny.  She stumbled upon some online porn videos and now wants to have sex so she can concentrate on her studying again and get her life back on track.  Mahesh tracks her down and they start a flirtation.  But that is forgotten when one of the tiny problems Mahesh tries to fix, a teenager scared and home alone who he sends a female police constable to comfort, turns into a Big Big problem when she is killed, along with the police constable, by a serial killer.

Mahesh becomes obsessed with tracking down this killer, finding his previous crimes and stopping future ones.  He learns his backstory, a little boy raised in a cemetery who only felt pleasure when listening to the sounds of grief.  As a child he killed people in his home village in order to enjoy the mourning that followed.  As an adult, he expanded his killing causing massive accidents and disasters.  With the help of his little brother, raised in the same environment.  Mahesh tracks him down through a series of clever uses of social media, and then kills his brother in front of him.  He is now focused on Mahesh, which was Mahesh’s plan, to distract him from his mass murder plans.  He attempts to kill Mahesh’s family, Mahesh stops him, but is injured.  In the hospital, the heroine admits her love out of the blue which ends that story line. Mahesh manages to track down the injured villain where he is hiding out holding a family hostage and convinces the neighbors to help rescue them through a TV soap opera.  The villain is captured, escapes, and sets off his first plan, arranging for a massive boulder to fall and roll towards a residential area.  Mahesh stops that, so the villain switches back to his original plan, blowing up a hospital.  Mahesh figures out which hospital it is, but arrives too late to stop everything, and instead stays to try to help save people.  He has a final battle with the villain and kills him, then gives a speech about how we have to remember to connect with people instead of just with computer and TV screens, and the movie ends.



First, this is just such a refreshingly well-made movie!  Deep visuals, if you know what I mean, there is something happening everywhere in the frame, you mind is engaged while you are watching.  And clean visuals too, you can easily understand everything that is happening at any given moment and how everything relates to everything else.

Especially refreshing in the big action scenes.  Even Hollywood directors (Hollywood being the industry that has come to specialize in these big action scenes) struggle to make what is happening clear to the audience in these moments.  And Murugadoss does it seemingly effortlessly.

This isn’t the simple central trick of his former films like Ghajini (with the short term memory) or Akira (with the mostly silent heroine), instead he draws out the complexity that is only hinted at in the script with his visuals.  It’s not just about “oh no, a hospital is collapsing!” it’s about “will that mother in the background snap out of shock and save her child?  Will that running person stop and help the falling person?  Is that wall about to collapse?”

And that’s the central question.  Will people stop, will people help?  Not “will the villains plan succeed?” but, “will people try to stop him?”  It’s something said explicitly at the end and hinted at through out, but it is the way the film is filmed that really drives the message home.

Going back to the opening sequence.  Niki in the comments was saying that she thinks perhaps the audience would have been less disappointed if it had opened with an action scene.  In the heavily promoted first song, we have flashes of action, but no real extended sequence.  It feels like that is what should have introduced our hero.

But instead we got something very different.  A different kind of crime which couldn’t be solved with a simple fight, and therefore a solution that fit this crime.  Two young men standing on a corner talking about the girl they have tricked, she will elope with one of them and then be surprised by “two wedding nights”.  The girl arrives, young and uncertain, and mentions sneaking out of the house while grandfather was sleeping, and bringing with her all the jewelry.  And we can fill in the plan, seduce an innocent girl who lives alone with an elderly guardian that won’t notice what is happening, get her to sneak out with the family jewelry, and as a bonus get a wedding night, and a rape to pay back the friend that is helping you.  Then leave with the jewelry.  A small messy crime.  Nothing to do with national security, nothing to even be reported to the police, something that would have made this girl and her grandfather miserable but would have no other effect.

And the solution is small and messy too.  To have the station chaiwalla and jasmine seller come up and joke with the boys, showing that they know all the details of what is happening, until the boys are spooked and take off, leaving the girl confused and unhappy, but not damaged.  And that is when Mahesh shows up.  To be the soothing brotherly type who offers her a ride and safely drops her home.

There’s a combination of things here, all aimed at saving the victim not punishing the perpetrators.  If they were to simply prevent the elopement, she would try again, she would still trust the boy.  If Mahesh were to show up and scare the boys off, she would turn him into her hero, think he is the only safe person in the world.  But instead we see that society in general can police itself.  It was two almost unnoticed people who scared them off.  And Mahesh appears as simply a nice caring person, an example of the kind of respectful nice boy she now knows exists and that she should look for.

And then we get the opening song.  Which shows a whole variety of other ways Mahesh saves people.  Sometimes, yes, with a fight, we see a snippet of rescuing a small boy from kidnappers.  But sometimes in other ways.  It’s not about the big fight that makes him look cool, that makes him a hero, it’s about saving the victim in the way that will make them feel the least damaged, emotionally and physically, afterwards.

When I say “it’s not about the big fight that makes him look cool”, I mean both Mahesh the character and Mahesh the actor.  There is a speech early on, when his best friend points out that with his brilliant mind and successful history in the software industry, he could do anything, Mahesh says he doesn’t want to do anything.  He just wants to help people in the small ways no one else notices.

(An interesting companion to his earlier Srimanthuda)

And this feels like a speech from Mahesh the actor as well.  He is choosing to use his superstar powers for this film, for this story.  He could do something bigger, a guaranteed hit, but he wanted this film, this film that was about the small things.

Even when we meet our villain, it is still about the small things.  Yes, he has killed a lot of people.  But not because of some grand plan.  And not because of some amazing intelligence or power.  Just because he is a broken human person who has lost the ability to care for others.  That is the scariest thing, to not care.  And the most important thing, to care.

Small digression here.  This movie argues that with the screens and the phones and the this and the that, we have lost the ability to care for our fellow man, to actually take a step outside of our homes and make that connection.  It always bothers me when people make these arguments, the general “people were more empathetic back in the day” arguments.  Because, I don’t think that is true.  Yes, we are online more now and so on and so on.  But, just to take an American example, we don’t have slavery any more!  Or, to put it another way, 150 years ago we had slavery.  Talk about not making a human connection, about looking the other way!!!!  Clearly this is something humans have always been capable of.  It’s just taking different forms as time moves on.

But what makes this movie amazing is how it positions our hero as someone who uses the “bad” new technology for a “good” purpose, and our villain as someone who uses the “good” human connections for a “bad” purpose.  S.J. Surya who plays the villain does a brilliantly terrifying job.  But what is really terrifying is how this villain is designed, his motivations and personality.  At a time when everyone is running away from human connection, to TV shows or text messages, he is running towards it.  He craves human misery, real misery that he can see and hear and touch.

Image result for sj surya spyder

(Also, he has great “disturbing guy” hair)

And Mahesh, he wants connections through things he can’t touch or see, but can only hear.  Phone calls, whatsapp, viral videos.  He uses them all to fool people into creating human connection.  He counts on human caring for others, but he creates it through technological falsehoods.  A Whatsapp video with a fake sad story in order to track down a real villain.  Calling dozens of delivery men with false orders to his house in order to prevent an attack on his family.  And finally, at the end, a fake contest on a soap opera to trick women into visiting their neighbors.

It is this last that shows the full story.  These women are obsessed with soap operas because it gives them the stories and human drama and connection they crave but have lost the ability to get in reality.  And so Mahesh uses that trust they have for the soap opera producers to trick them into helping him, a trust they wouldn’t have for a police officer who knocks on their door.  But slowly, as he gets them to leave farther and farther from their house, he builds their trust in the voice on the phone.  Until he is able to tell them the truth, that there is a real person in danger right next door, not in the soap opera, and he wants their help to save these people just because it is the right and human thing to do.  And they step up!  He uses technology as a bridge, but the end result as compassion.

Even the really stupid romance has that same lesson.  Rakul Preet Singh, our heroine, first discovers sex and desire through a video that pops up online.  She talks about it over the phone with her friend, which Mahesh overhears through his tapping software.  And then he wants to turn it into something in reality.  But for a long time, the reality and the technical keep conflicting with each other.  He follows her using his cell phone, she tries to turn it into reality, he backs off.  She shows up at his house having randomly purchased his mother’s old computer online, he can handle the dissatisfaction with the online purchase, but not the fact of her in his parents’ home.  There’s this back and forth that isn’t resolved until he almost dies and she admits that she actually cares for him.  Technology makes it easy for them to connect, but it is only an almost connection.  It’s that final step over the gap that is so difficult.


33 thoughts on “Spyder Review (SPOILERS): Closing the Technical Gap

  1. That the hero cannot save everyone in danger is a terrific choice, especially in the climax where Mahesh wants to save the people using a weak iron ladder. Baradwaj Rangan rightly said that Mahesh played the serene god pitted against Suryah’s unhinged demon. It’s almost mythic.

    Strangely, the names of these characters too denote something. Hero is Shiva and villain is Bhairavudu. Bhairava is a fierce, unrestrained, constraint-less aspect of Shiva. Contrary to what people believe, Shiva is super sane and relaxed (thanks to Parvathi). The rage we see in his stories is actually about Rudra, Bhairava, and other unrestrained aspects of the deity. But, while Bhairava is a guardian deity, our villain is a threat maker.

    Metaphorically, these two roles with these names show two different aspects of the same thing: humanity.
    Though that happens for almost every film, the way it is dealt here is refreshing.

    Thanks for the review. ☺


    • Excellent commentary about different aspects of Shiva. There is also another aspect called ‘Veerabhadra’, whose rage can be seen in ‘Daksha Yagna’ stories. He is the one who beheads Daksha for causing Sati’s self-immolation.


  2. Pingback: Box Office (With Youtube Video Included): Judwaa Turns off the US, Spyder Scares Off the US | dontcallitbollywood

  3. It’s a really good movie, but it was still disappointing for me. I was expecting more from the combo of AR Murugadoss and Mahesh. I’m totally fine with a movie where there aren’t any action sequences for Mahesh, but I wasn’t expecting that kind of a movie from A.R. Murugadoss. Spyder felt like a movie that would have more suited a younger actor who is aspiring to become an action hero. I definitely think that having an intro fight and maybe replacing the roller coaster sequence with an one-on-one fight sequence between Bharath and Mahesh would have been more commercially viable and more fun to be honest. To me it was like you got a big star like Mahesh and you don’t take advantage of him. One thing that Mahesh is popular for is his running style (don’t ask, I don’t really get it either 🙂 ). Instead of spending so much money on the vfx for the roller coaster sequence, they could have just come up with a situation where Mahesh chases Bharath and eventually catches him. Something like that was in Dookudu where Mahesh catches Sonu Sood’s brother in Instanbul.

    I actually would love for Varun to remake Spyder in Hindi with someone like Rajkummar Rao playing S.J. Suryah’s role.


    • Hmm, that makes sense. I had forgotten the rollarcoaster fight, which sort of supports your point. it was forgettable, in a way that the more grounded human moments were not.


      • I felt like it could have been really cool but then they didn’t spend as much for the vfx so it ended up being forgettable. The boulder sequence and the fire in the hospital in the climax were good but the roller coaster sequence seemed unnecessary.

        So what do you think of Rajkummar Rao and Varun?


        • Rajkummar is perfect, I’d also love to see Jim Sarbh (villain in Raabta and Neerja) attack it. Varun, I’m not sure about. Because I think he needs to have a kind of restrained calm intelligence to him, and I haven’t really seen Varun play that. He came close in Badlapur, but that was also a very dark character. I could see Sushant Singh Rajput pull it off, it’s very close to his roles in Dhoni and Byomkesh.

          On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:06 PM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



          • That would be exactly why you would cast Varun. Because it’s against type!

            But if I were going to cast a bigger star, then maybe I would approach Akshay Kumar.


          • I’d love to see the two Akshay’s play against each other in this! Akshaye Khanna is just amazing in off-beat sort of characters like this

            On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:17 PM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



  4. Also I didn’t necessarily like the romance but I thought it was quite unique that the heroine talks about sex and watching porn. A problem that I had was that Rakul can’t do the nerd look well. Someone like Illeana would have be so much better in that look.


    • I was hoping someone would bring her up in the comments! Because I thought of other things I wanted to say after I posted the review. I really liked the moments when he is following her and sees her studying, at temple, having a whole personality beyond just the sex stuff. It felt like they were building something interesting, that he is intrigued not just by her sex idea, but that this sex idea exists in combination with the rest of her personality. The nerdy responsible high achieving doctor type who is equally focused and determined about her sexuality. And it would have been a good match for Mahesh’s focused internal thoughtful kind of character.

      But somehow it didn’t quite gel, they didn’t give it enough time and the actress couldn’t quite make an impression with the little she was given.


      • I like Rakul but I do not like her in the roles where she doesn’t play a village belle! I think that she does those kinds of characters really well but other than that, I find her to be limited.

        Someone like Samantha or Kajal could have done a lot more with this character even considering the limited screen time. Actually they would have been great choices considering that both have worked with A.R. Murugadoss before, they can speak both Telugu and Tamil, and most importantly both of them actually have good chemistry with Mahesh.


          • Shruthi Haasan isn’t exactly bad in her Telugu movies though. Most likely since she doesn’t dub for herself 🙂


        • Kajal can neither speak Tamil nor Telugu even though she’s been in a dozen movies. Tamanna, on the other hand,also being a North Indian, speaks both the languages quite fluently, which impressed me. Even Rakul speaks quite a bit of Telugu even though she’s just starting. Maybe if Kajal puts in some more efforts,her acting would improve. Samantha was born and brought up in Chennai, so Tamil is sort of her mother tongue,and she also speaks Telugu fluently.


          • Yeah, Kajal can’t speak Telugu fluently but she’s at least familiar with the language. My point was that A.R. Murugadoss said that they opted for Rakul because she knows both languages but in reality there were better options when you look at it that way. I’m sure that Kajal is more familiar with Tamil than Rakul is though Rakul does speak quite a bit of Telugu now.


      • Its interesting you say this because the director mentioned in an interview that he had specific ideas for the Rakul’s character and planned for her to be the major third character but had to leave most of it out due to time. He said that he envisioned her as the opposite of Surya’s character. Surya was someone who was happiest when he saw people at the end of the end of their lives. Rakul was supposed to be an obstetrician who was happiest when she could help those at the beginning of their lives. He wanted to have the interplay of these opposites around Mahesh. Apparently, he’d written a flashback for her that they never filmed. It sounded pretty interesting but I get the feeling he was describing more of an intense drama with a little bit of action rather than an out and out action film.

        It might have been better if he did make this as he initially wrote it and marketed it in that way – come see Mahesh do something different vs a come see a Mahesh action film.


  5. Margaret, I watched it this saturday and liked it. This movie is for real movie fans and not for Mahesh fans. My niece and her friends also have negative opinion about this movie. You said there are flaws in movie. I can think of below flaws.

    1. Villain’s backstory creats some sympathy for him. So it may be difficult for audience to cheer when hero fights him.

    2. Sometimes hero”s voice explains how is going from point A to point B. It is against the theory of “show, don’t tell’.

    3. The end lecture by Mahesh is very preachy and boring. Instead they could have made it a subtle message given through a scene. Again “show, don’t tell’.

    4. The narrative makes viewer glued to the seat on first watch. But it is not worth watching again and again. So no repeat audience.

    To me, it almost felt like hollywood movie with Indian actors.


    • I am so glad you enjoyed it! Interesting point about low repeat viewing since it is primarily about suspense.

      On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:25 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



      • Another reason for low repeat audience is because of how psychotic the villain was. I don’t think I would have been able to rewatch Spyder right away due to that villain’s character.


        • Good point! And he didn’t have that “love to hate” effect that you want in a villain. I’m thinking like gabbar Singh, who was terrifying, but also fun to repeat his lines and hissss at and boo and stuff. But this villain, he is scary and yet not showy or entertaining, just scarey.

          On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:03 AM, dontcallitbollywood wrote:



        • If anybody dares to watch again and again, there is a danger that their sadistic disorder rises from 5 % to 50 % picked up from psychotic villain 🙂


  6. Pingback: Box Office Report: Mahanubhavudu Continues the Telugu Trend, Chef Fails to Sizzle | dontcallitbollywood

  7. Pingback: Happy Birthday to My Father! | dontcallitbollywood

  8. Pingback: Happy Birthday to One of My Favorite Commentators! | dontcallitbollywood

  9. Pingback: Global Box Office: Adnathavasi and Spyder, Second Verse Same as the First | dontcallitbollywood

  10. Pingback: Tuesday Tamil: Theeran Adhigaaram Ondru, a Modern Version of Thugs of Hindostan | dontcallitbollywood

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.